Catalytic Reforming Simulation for Reactor Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current catalytic reforming processes in crude oil refining are limited in efficiency due to reliance on coarse data and real-time reaction constraints, which hinder optimization of operating parameters for maximizing octane number, hydrogen production, and hydrocarbon yields.

Innovation Solution

A method involving computational simulation to optimize operating parameters, particularly inlet gas temperatures and pressure, for each reactor in catalytic reforming facilities, using detailed chemical composition data and kinetic modeling to achieve specific objective functions, such as maximizing reformate output or hydrogen yield.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If real-time regulation software with closed-loop control is used, then rapid reaction to changed conditions is possible, but optimization capability is limited due to coarse data acquisition and processing constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction speedVSAvoidoptimization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing detailed simulations and optimizations before actual reactor operation. The system uses historical data and kinetic models to pre-determine optimal operating parameters for each reactor stage, allowing comprehensive optimization without real-time computational constraints while maintaining the ability to react to changes through the established parameter sets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If kinetic reactor models with statistical values are used, then generic modeling is achieved, but manufacturing precision and process optimization are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling generalityVSAvoidprocess optimization precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by transitioning from generic statistical models to facility-specific kinetic models. The system determines reaction kinetics specific to each reactor stage based on actual facility data, catalyst characteristics, and operating conditions. This allows precise optimization of each local reactor stage while maintaining the overall system's adaptability through the modular kinetic model approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If uniform operating parameters are applied across all reactor stages, then operation simplicity is maintained, but productivity and efficiency are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidreformate yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the reforming process into distinct reactor stages, each with individually optimized operating parameters. The system determines specific temperature, pressure, and flow rate parameters for each reactor stage based on kinetic models and desired product distribution, allowing maximum productivity while maintaining ease of operation through systematic parameter management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise adjustment of operating conditions to enhance efficiency by up to 5% in reformate yield and improves the overall process accuracy, enabling better adaptation to reaction kinetics and equilibrium states.

Implementation Method 1

facilities for catalytic reforming... the catalyser—with a sand-like consistency—is arranged between an outer gas-permeable wall and an inner gas-permeable wall and through which, generally from the outside to the inside, a gas mixture with the evaporated raw gasoline (naphtha) which is to be reformed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS11248178B2Operation of facilities for catalytic reforming
Publication Date: 2022.02.15 SWISS RR ENG GRP AG
  • US11248178B2 patent drawing
  • US11248178B2 patent drawing
  • US11248178B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for optimising the operation of a facility for catalytic reforming, the facility including a multitude of reactors which have a catalyser and through which an operating gas including hydrocarbons and molecular hydrogen successively flows, wherein the composition of the operating gas in the reactors changes and wherein a product results at the outlet side of the last reactor. Specific constant characteristics as well as initial operating parameters that are present during the operation of the facility are acquired. A computational simulation of the chemical processes in the reactors then takes place, wherein results of a measurement of the chemical composition of the product at the outlet side of the last reactor is also included. A computational simulation of the chemical processes in the reactors with different varied operating parameters is subsequently carried out and set of optimised operating parameters is determined from the computed chemical composition.