Catchment Pit Drainage Module for Molten Metal Spills

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing catchment pits in smelting plants face challenges in efficiently draining large quantities of water following a spill, leading to potential flooding and increased risk of steam explosions due to the low permeability of cupola slag and undersized drainage openings.

Innovation Solution

The catchment pit design incorporates a drainage module with a refractory, water-permeable side wall and a pump system that evacuates water from the pit, significantly increasing the water entry area and flow rate compared to traditional designs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cupola slag is used as drainage material, then water permeability is improved, but drainage capacity deteriorates due to sintering and low permeability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater permeabilityVSAvoiddrainage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The drainage system is divided into multiple independent drainage openings distributed across the floor, each capable of draining water independently. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high drainage capacity even if individual openings become blocked or sintered, resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the drainage system use different materials and designs: the floor uses cupola slag for water permeability, while the drainage openings are specifically designed with larger dimensions and alternative materials to prevent sintering. This local differentiation allows each component to optimize its function, resolving the contradiction between water permeability and drainage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If drainage opening size is increased, then drainage capacity is improved, but protection against solids entry deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrainage capacityVSAvoidsolids contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The drainage openings are designed with locally differentiated properties: they are large enough to drain water quickly but incorporate specific geometric features and positioning that prevent solid particles from entering. The openings are strategically located and shaped to allow water flow while blocking solids, resolving the contradiction between drainage capacity and solids protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

A granular bulk material layer is introduced as an intermediary between the drainage openings and the chamber interior. This layer acts as a filter that allows water to pass through to the drainage openings while preventing solid particles from entering the drainage system, thus resolving the contradiction between drainage capacity and solids contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If multiple drainage openings are provided, then drainage capacity is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrainage capacityVSAvoiddrainage system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drainage system is segmented into multiple simple, identical drainage openings distributed across the floor. Each opening has a simple design that can be easily constructed and maintained. This segmentation approach increases drainage capacity through parallel flow paths while keeping individual components simple, resolving the contradiction between productivity and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Object-affected harmful factors

If water drainage openings are made small to prevent solids entry, then solids protection is improved, but water drainage capacity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolids contaminationVSAvoidwater drainage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

A granular bulk material layer is introduced as an intermediary filtering medium between the chamber interior and the drainage openings. This layer allows water to pass through freely while blocking solid particles, enabling the drainage openings to be designed for maximum water capacity without concern for solids entry, thus resolving the contradiction between solids protection and water drainage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The drainage function is segmented into two independent components: the granular bulk material layer that handles solids filtration, and the drainage openings that handle water discharge. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, with the drainage openings designed for maximum water capacity and the granular layer providing solids protection, resolving the contradiction between solids contamination and water drainage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables rapid and complete drainage of water from the catchment pit, reducing the risk of flooding and steam explosions, while also providing a cost-effective solution by utilizing readily available materials like gravel.

Implementation Method 1

chambers being provided for receiving the molten metal. These chambers are bounded by a floor and side walls that in at least the lower regions of the walls and the floor are formed by a base element made of refractory, water-permeable material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPermeation: Permeation

Implementation Method 2

Cupola slag is very porous and therefore conducts water and water vapor well into the screen gravel layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 3

cupola furnace slag sinters immediately when it comes into contact with molten metal, making it impermeable and preventing the molten metal from penetrating into the sieve gravel layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 4

A pump connected to the drainage conduit can thus evacuate water from the recess

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20250034665A1Catchment pit for molten metal and coolant water
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 SILMETA SILIKATE FUR DIE METALLURGISCHE IND PROD & VERTRIEB GMBH & CO KG
  • US20250034665A1 patent drawing
  • US20250034665A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A catchment pit for molten metal and cooling water. has a floor formed with a recess and upwardly open chambers in the pit for receiving the molten metal and supported on the floor. Portions of the side walls of the chambers adjacent respective floors of the chambers and these floors are made of refractory and water-permeable material. A drainage module extends in the pit down into the recess and has a refractory water-permeable side wall so that water in the chambers can pass down into the recess. Granular bulk material fills the pit around and under the chambers and drainage module. A drainage conduit extending down in the drainage module to an intake end in the recess below the chambers. A pump connected to the drainage conduit can thus evacuate water from the recess.