3D Dampers for Subsea Catenary Line Motion Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Offshore engineering catenary lines experience significant dynamic bending stresses, axial loads, and buckling due to dynamic motions and hydrodynamic forces, leading to reduced fatigue life and increased costs associated with complex line configurations and high installation loads in deepwater conditions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of dynamics decoupling, damping, buoyancy, mass, and added mass modifying devices along the catenary line near the seabed, optimizing buoyancy, submerged weight, and drag to reduce dynamic motions without increasing line length, and utilizing novel buoyancy shapes to suppress Vortex Induced Vibrations and dynamic excitations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex line configurations are used to reduce dynamic motions, then dynamic tension and buckling are reduced, but device complexity and installation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue lifeVSAvoidline configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies physical parameters of the catenary line by adding devices that change buoyancy, mass, and drag characteristics. These parameter changes alter the dynamic response of the line without requiring complex reconfiguration of the entire line system, thereby improving fatigue life while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than modifying the entire line configuration, the patent applies localized modifications at specific positions along the catenary line. The devices are positioned to create local changes in buoyancy and mass distribution, which effectively reduce dynamic motions and buckling without requiring complex changes throughout the entire line system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If traditional motion suppression methods are used, then dynamic bending stresses are reduced, but installation loads and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue resistanceVSAvoidinstallation load
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs devices that provide buoyant forces to counteract the weight and dynamic loads of the catenary line. These buoyancy devices effectively reduce the installation loads by providing upward counterbalancing forces, while also reducing dynamic bending stresses during operation, thereby improving fatigue resistance without excessive installation weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Reliability

If line length is increased to reduce dynamic effects, then dynamic tension is reduced, but productivity and installation efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue lifeVSAvoidinstallation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing line length to reduce dynamic effects, the patent changes other physical parameters of the line system by incorporating devices that modify buoyancy, mass, and drag. This allows dynamic tension to be reduced through parameter modification rather than geometric extension, maintaining installation efficiency while improving fatigue life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces dynamic tension, increases the minimum dynamic radius of curvature, enhances fatigue life, and decreases the range of stress components, effectively mitigating buckling and fatigue damage while maintaining acceptable installation costs.

Implementation Method 1

The implementation of dynamics decoupling, damping, buoyancy, mass, and added mass modifying devices along the catenary line near the seabed, optimizing buoyancy, submerged weight, and drag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

optimizing buoyancy, submerged weight, and drag to reduce dynamic motions without increasing line length

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Implementation Method 3

The implementation of dynamics decoupling, damping, buoyancy, mass, and added mass modifying devices along the catenary line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdded mass: Added Mass

Data Source

PatentUS8888411B2Catenary line dynamic motion suppression
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 WAJNIKONIS KRZYSZTOF JAN
  • US8888411B2 patent drawing
  • US8888411B2 patent drawing
  • US8888411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention introduces three-dimensional (3D) damper arrangements that are used to suppress dynamic motions of a subsea line like a riser, on which the dampers are installed. Damping surfaces (shapes) are mounted on the line so that their combined drag per line unit length dampens motions in 3 mutually perpendicular directions: axial, in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP). 3D suppression is provided by integral 3D dampers or by combining IP-OOP dampers like strakes with neighboring axial dampers. Increased line motions suppression is achieved by decoupling, particularly on dampers mounted in regions of high line curvature and/or small effective tension. This invention also presents Short Lazy Wave (SLW) configurations of rigid catenary risers, which are also used to suppress dynamic motions. 3D dampers can be used together with SLWs. Motion suppression is introduced to reduce dynamic stresses and to increase fatigue life of the lines.