Urinary Catheter Tip Flexibility via Patterned Drainage Holes
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing intermittent urinary catheters with flexible tips require additional material and are longer due to the placement of drainage holes further back from the tip, resulting in a less efficient insertion process.
Innovation Solution
The catheter shaft's proximal insertion end portion includes a plurality of drainage holes in a pattern positioned close to the terminal end, enhancing flexibility and allowing for a shorter insertion length by distributing the holes along the shaft in various configurations such as columns and rows, or varying sizes and shapes, to facilitate easier navigation through the urethra.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If drainage holes are positioned further back from the tip to create a flexible insertion tip, then flexibility of the proximal insertion end portion is improved, but the catheter length increases and additional material is required
Solution Approach 1:
The catheter shaft is segmented into distinct regions: a proximal insertion end portion with drainage holes positioned close to the terminal end, and a distal portion. This segmentation allows the proximal end to be optimized for flexibility while the distal end maintains structural integrity, eliminating the need for extended catheter length.
Solution Approach 2:
The drainage holes are strategically positioned in the proximal insertion end portion close to the terminal end, creating localized flexibility where needed for urethral navigation, while the rest of the catheter maintains its structural properties for proper positioning and drainage function.
2Ease of operation
If drainage holes are positioned further back from the tip, then flexibility of the proximal insertion end portion is improved, but the catheter requires additional material
Solution Approach 1:
By segmenting the catheter into functional regions and concentrating drainage holes in the proximal insertion end portion, the design eliminates the need for extended catheter length and additional material that would be required if holes were positioned further back.
Solution Approach 2:
The drainage holes are concentrated in the proximal insertion end portion where flexibility is needed, allowing the catheter to achieve the required flexibility without extending the overall length or using additional material in other regions.
3Ease of operation
If the proximal insertion end portion is made flexible by thinning the neck region, then ease of insertion is improved, but the drainage holes must be positioned further back reducing drainage efficiency
Solution Approach 1:
The catheter is segmented into a proximal insertion end portion with drainage holes and a distal drainage end portion. This segmentation allows the drainage holes to be positioned optimally in the proximal end for both flexibility and drainage efficiency, rather than being forced further back.
Solution Approach 2:
The drainage holes are positioned in the proximal insertion end portion where local flexibility is needed for insertion, eliminating the trade-off between insertion ease and drainage efficiency that occurs when holes must be positioned further back.
Data Source
AI summary
Urinary catheters (100) that have drainage holes (112) that impart a desired flexibility to the proximal insertion end portion of the catheter.


