Cathode Active Material Calcination With Robotic Quality Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing cathode active materials in lithium ion batteries result in inconsistent product quality and high amounts of off-spec material, leading to increased costs and performance issues such as volumetric energy density and capacity fade.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the mixing of composite oxides, hydroxides, or carbonates of nickel, cobalt, and manganese with lithium sources and optional dopants, followed by calcination in a controlled kiln environment, and subsequent robotic sampling and electrochemical testing to ensure homogeneous product quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional two-stage manufacturing process is used, then production cost is reduced, but product quality homogeneity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality homogeneityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the manufacturing process into multiple controlled stages: (a) mixing precursor compounds with lithium sources and dopants, (b) optional transfer to saggars/crucibles, (c) calcination in controlled kiln environments (pusher kiln, roller hearth kiln, or rotary kiln) at 700-1000°C, and (d) cooling. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently for quality control while maintaining cost efficiency through standardized procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies critical parameters including calcination temperature (700-1000°C range), holding time, atmospheric conditions, and material composition (dopants like Mg, Al, Y, Ti, Zr, Nb, Ta, Fe, Mo, W). These parameter changes enable precise control over product homogeneity and electrochemical performance while identifying optimal cost-performance trade-offs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If manual sampling and testing is used, then equipment complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting throughputVSAvoidrobotic automation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system performs self-service functions by automatically sampling materials from saggars/crucibles, preparing electrode material mixes, and conducting electrochemical tests without human intervention. The system includes automated material transfer, mixing, and testing capabilities that operate autonomously to maximize productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The robot performs preliminary actions by taking multiple samples (10 mg to 10 g each) from different locations within saggars before the main testing phase. This preliminary sampling and mixing ensures representative material characterization and enables parallel testing of multiple samples, increasing overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of substance

If quality variation is allowed, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but loss of substance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoff-spec materialVSAvoidquality control process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through systematic electrochemical testing of multiple samples from each production batch. The robotic system measures electrochemical properties and compares results against specifications, providing feedback that enables real-time quality assessment and process adjustment to minimize off-spec material generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by testing a representative subset of samples (10 mg to 10 g from each saggar) rather than analyzing entire production batches. This approach provides sufficient quality control to minimize off-spec material while avoiding the excessive complexity of 100% inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process produces electrode active materials with improved homogeneity and reduced off-spec material, enhancing the stability and performance of lithium ion batteries by ensuring consistent quality and reducing manual labor and costs.

Implementation Method 1

calcining said mixture in a pusher kiln or roller hearth kiln or rotary kiln at a temperature in the range of from 700 to 1000°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

transferring said samples to another robot or to another part of the same robot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical transfer:

Data Source

PatentEP4097780B1Process for making an electrode active material
Publication Date: 2024.07.31 BASF SE
  • EP4097780B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Process for making an electrode active material, said process comprising the steps of: (a) mixing a composite oxide, (oxy)hydroxide, hydroxide or carbonate of nickel and at least one of cobalt and manganese and, optionally, at least one of Mg, Al and Y or a transition metal selected from Ti, Zr, Nb, Ta, Fe, Mo, and W, with at least one source of lithium selected from lithium carbonate, lithium oxide and lithium hydroxide and, optionally, with at least one dopant selected from oxides, hydroxides and oxyhydroxides of Mg, Al, Y, Ti, Zr, Nb, Ta, Fe, Mo, and W, and from fluorides, (b) optionally, transferring said mixture into saggars, crucibles or open cups, (c) calcining said mixture in a pusher kiln or roller hearth kiln or rotary kiln at a temperature in the range of from 700 to 1000°C, (d) cooling down the resultant electrode active material, (e) applying a robot to take at least two samples of 10 mg to 10 g of every saggar, crucible or open cup to be analyzed, or per defined period of time, respectively, (f) transferring said samples to another robot or to another part of the same robot, where the robot makes an electrode material mix from samples of the same saggar, crucible or open cup, and (g) transferring the electrode material mix to a test unit to perform electrochemical tests, wherein the robot performs steps (f) to (g) with several samples in parallel.