Cathode Degradation Prediction via Atomic Defect Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods fail to accurately predict battery performance degradation during charge cycling due to irreversible changes in the atomic structure of cathode materials, relying on experimental investigations that are costly and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

An automated system and method using atomistic simulations, specifically simulating atomic rearrangements and defect formation in cathode materials through density functional theory, to model degradation-dependent open cell voltage and discharge capacity curves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional experimental investigations are used to study battery performance degradation, then measurement precision can be achieved, but loss of time and productivity are significantly reduced due to costly and time-consuming experiments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance degradation prediction accuracyVSAvoidtime for experimental investigations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates computational models that copy and simulate the physical battery degradation processes. Instead of performing physical experiments, the system uses density functional theory calculations to model atomic-scale defects and their evolution during battery cycling, producing virtual copies of degradation phenomena that can be analyzed without time-consuming physical tests

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/experimental investigation system with a computational modeling system. Density functional theory calculations and atomistic simulations substitute for physical battery testing, allowing performance degradation to be predicted through computational mechanics rather than experimental mechanics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If conventional modeling of pristine batteries is used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of performance prediction deteriorates because it cannot account for degradation during operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling complexityVSAvoidperformance prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary identification and modeling of degradation mechanisms before they significantly impact battery performance. By using density functional theory to predict defect formation energies and atomic-scale degradation pathways in advance, the system can account for degradation effects in the modeling framework before they manifest as actual performance loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the modeling parameters from pristine-state assumptions to degradation-inclusive parameters. The system incorporates defect concentrations, atomic configuration changes, and stoichiometry variations that occur during battery cycling, transforming the model from a simple pristine-state representation to a complex degradation-aware representation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If atomistic simulations with degradation defects are performed, then reliability of performance prediction is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegradation prediction accuracyVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the battery degradation problem into atomic-scale components that can be modeled independently. By focusing on individual defect types (vacancies, interstitials, antisite defects) and their local atomic environments using density functional theory, the system breaks down the complex degradation process into manageable atomic-scale segments that can be simulated and then aggregated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If extensive experimental investigations are conducted to optimize cathode materials, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but productivity is reduced due to the iterative experimental process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial optimization accuracyVSAvoidmaterial development rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational screening of cathode materials using density functional theory calculations. By predicting degradation behavior, defect formation energies, and stability properties before synthesis, the system identifies promising material candidates in advance, allowing experimental efforts to focus only on the most promising candidates rather than testing numerous materials iteratively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the prediction of battery performance degradation and optimization of cathode materials by simulating atomic defects and structural changes, reducing the need for costly experimental investigations and focusing on materials meeting desired performance criteria.

Implementation Method 1

A systematic procedure relates the degradation of battery performance metrics to underlying structural changes due to atomic rearrangements within the material, for example through density functional theory simulations.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity functional theory:

Implementation Method 2

The determining and storing in the third data structure of the open cell voltage of the cathode material at each stoichiometry or capacity may comprise determining, in an automated manner using the processor, a difference in chemical potential of a charge carrier in the cathode material versus a reference charge carrier electrode as a function of the charge carrier concentration.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical potential difference:

Data Source

PatentUS11442111B2System and method for determining degradation dependent open cell voltage for cathode materials
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 DASSAULT SYSTEMS AMERICAS CORP
  • US11442111B2 patent drawing
  • US11442111B2 patent drawing
  • US11442111B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated system and method to investigate degradation of cathode materials in batteries via atomistic simulations, and in particular by simulating the creation of atomistic defects in the cathode material, which occurs during charge cycling. A systematic procedure relates the degradation of battery performance metrics to underlying structural changes due to atomic rearrangements within the material, for example through density functional theory simulations. The performance metrics modeled with this approach include the Open Cell Voltage (OCV) as well as the discharge capacity curve.