Cationic Polymer Foam Separation for PFAS Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for removing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from wastewater, particularly landfill leachate, are impractical and costly due to the complex matrix of effluents, limiting their effectiveness on a large scale.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of cationic polymers, such as polydiallyldimethyl ammonium and polyamine, that enhances PFAS partitioning at the air-water interface by creating a foam layer when gas is bubbled through the wastewater, allowing for effective separation and removal of PFAS.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If granular and powdered activated carbon, ion exchange resins, nanofiltration, or reverse osmosis are used for PFAS removal, then PFAS removal effectiveness is improved, but device complexity and cost increase making them impractical for large-scale landfill leachate treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS removal effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the physical-chemical parameters of the wastewater treatment process by adjusting pH levels and using chemical coagulants to precipitate PFAS compounds, transforming them into removable solid particles that can be separated through simple sedimentation and filtration, avoiding complex membrane or ion exchange systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts PFAS compounds from the complex landfill leachate matrix by selectively precipitating them using chemical coagulants and flocculants, separating the harmful substances from the wastewater through phase separation into solid flocs and liquid effluent

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If advanced treatment methods like reverse osmosis or nanofiltration are implemented, then PFAS removal efficiency is improved, but operational cost and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS removal efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses inexpensive, readily available chemical coagulants (such as aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride) and common flocculants that can be easily dosed and replaced, replacing expensive energy-intensive membrane systems with low-cost chemical additives that achieve comparable PFAS removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical high-pressure membrane systems (reverse osmosis, nanofiltration) with chemical precipitation and gravitational sedimentation processes, substituting high-energy mechanical separation with low-energy chemical and physical separation mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If existing treatment technologies are used for landfill leachate, then some PFAS removal is achieved, but the complex matrix of effluent interferes with treatment effectiveness and increases cost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS removal capabilityVSAvoidtreatment adaptability to complex matrix
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary chemical conditioning of the landfill leachate by adding coagulants and adjusting pH before separation, preparing the complex matrix for effective PFAS precipitation and removal, thereby improving subsequent treatment effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention modifies key water quality parameters (pH, oxidation-reduction potential, ionic composition) through chemical addition to transform the complex leachate matrix into a more treatable state that facilitates selective PFAS precipitation and separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves high PFAS removal efficiency, with removal rates of at least 90% in some cases, making it a more practical and cost-effective solution for large-scale PFAS removal from wastewater.

Implementation Method 1

gas can be bubbled through the waste water to form a foam on the surface of the waste water comprising the gas and at least some of the PFAS component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFoam: Foam

Implementation Method 2

The cationic polymer enhances PFAS partitioning at the air-water interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartitioning:

Implementation Method 3

gas can be bubbled through the waste water to form a foam on the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS11840471B1Method for removing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from waste water
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 REPUBLIC SERVICES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HLDG INC
  • US11840471B1 patent drawing
  • US11840471B1 patent drawing
  • US11840471B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for enhancing the removal of a per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) component from waste water using a cationic polymer (e.g., a cationic polymer flocculant or coagulant). The cationic polymer enables gas that is diffused through the waste water to carry at least a portion of the PFAS component to the surface of water, creating a foam that can then be removed.