Cattle Separator Rigid Front Flexible Rear Plastic Tubular

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flexible separators in livestock buildings, particularly for cattle, are not optimally designed, leading to animal injuries due to excessive flexibility and deformation, which compromises their effectiveness and efficiency over time.

Innovation Solution

A separator system comprising a rigid front metal tubular organ and a laterally flexible rear part made of plastic tubular organs, with a rigid liaison organ that connects them, providing a balance between stability and flexibility to prevent animal injuries and maintain system efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If flexible separators are used to reduce animal injuries, then animal safety is improved, but the separators become too flexible and lose effectiveness over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanimal injury riskVSAvoidseparator effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The separator is divided into two distinct parts: a rigid front part for structural stability and positioning, and a flexible rear part for safety and comfort. This segmentation allows each part to fulfill its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the separator have different mechanical properties: the front part is rigid to maintain positioning effectiveness, while the rear part is flexible to reduce injury risk. This local differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between effectiveness and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If rigid separators are used to maintain positioning effectiveness, then separator reliability is improved, but animal injury risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparator effectivenessVSAvoidanimal injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The separator is divided into two distinct parts: a rigid front part for structural stability and positioning, and a flexible rear part for safety and comfort. This segmentation allows each part to fulfill its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the separator have different mechanical properties: the front part is rigid to maintain positioning effectiveness, while the rear part is flexible to reduce injury risk. This local differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between effectiveness and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If completely flexible separators are used to ensure animal safety, then animal injury risk is reduced, but the separators become ineffective for positioning animals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanimal injury riskVSAvoidanimal positioning effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The separator is divided into two distinct parts: a rigid front part for structural stability and positioning, and a flexible rear part for safety and comfort. This segmentation allows each part to fulfill its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the separator have different mechanical properties: the front part is rigid to maintain positioning effectiveness, while the rear part is flexible to reduce injury risk. This local differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between effectiveness and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed separator system effectively delimits animal space, reduces the risk of injury, and maintains efficiency by combining the stability of a rigid front with the flexibility of a plastic rear part, ensuring durable and effective animal separation.

Implementation Method 1

a laterally flexible rear part, comprising: at least two flexible tubular members made of plastic material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4265105B1Separator for a cattle-breeding building, in particular for cattle
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 GRP ELASTOTECK
  • EP4265105B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The present invention relates to a separator for a livestock building, in particular for cattle. It comprises: - a rigid front part (5), comprising a metal tubular element (51) equipped with first means for securing (7) to a receiving structure (C), and - a laterally flexible rear part (6), comprising at least two flexible plastic tubular elements (61), and a rigid connecting element (62).