Causal Environment Control With Adaptive Parameter Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for controlling environments struggle to efficiently determine optimal control settings due to limitations in modeling-based and active control methods, particularly in dynamic systems.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that obtain baseline probability distributions and maintain a causal model to identify causal relationships between control settings and environment responses, repeatedly selecting settings based on the causal model and baseline distributions, and adjusting internal parameters to optimize system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If modeling-based techniques are used to control the environment, then the system can passively observe historical data and learn patterns, but the system cannot efficiently determine optimal control settings in dynamic systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol decision speedVSAvoidaccuracy of control settings
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic control system that continuously updates the causal model as new data becomes available, allowing the system to adapt to changing environmental conditions. The causal model is not static but evolves over time, incorporating new observations and adjusting control recommendations accordingly, which resolves the contradiction between fast decision-making and accuracy in dynamic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where environment responses to control settings are monitored and used to update the causal model. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from actual outcomes and improve future control decisions, ensuring both speed and reliability by continuously refining the model based on real-world performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If active control techniques are used to generate knowledge, then the system can perform controlled experimentation, but the system requires extensive computational resources and data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecausal relationship accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial experimentation by selectively conducting controlled experiments only for specific control settings and environmental conditions where causal relationships need to be determined. Rather than exhaustively testing all possible scenarios, the system focuses computational resources on the most critical unknowns, reducing overall resource requirements while maintaining measurement precision for key parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts experimental parameters such as sample size, confidence intervals, and exploration-exploitation tradeoffs based on the current state of knowledge. As the causal model becomes more certain about certain relationships, the system reduces experimentation in those areas and allocates resources to areas with higher uncertainty, optimizing the balance between precision and computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the system repeatedly experiments with different internal parameter values, then the system can optimize control decisions, but the system increases the frequency of sub-optimal control settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performance optimizationVSAvoidtime spent with sub-optimal settings
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary experimentation and causal model building during off-peak periods or when the environment is in stable states, so that by the time optimization is needed, the causal model is already well-established. This preliminary action reduces the need for frequent experimentation during critical operational periods, minimizing the time spent with sub-optimal settings while still achieving optimization goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12282304B2Determining causal models for controlling environments
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • US12282304B2 patent drawing
  • US12282304B2 patent drawing
  • US12282304B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for determining causal models for controlling environments. One of the methods includes obtaining data specifying baseline probability distributions for each of a plurality of controllable elements; maintaining a causal model; repeatedly performing the following: selecting control settings for the environment based on the causal model and values for a particular internal parameter of the control system that are sampled from a range of possible values; selecting control settings for the environment based on the baseline probability distributions; monitoring environment responses to the control settings selected based on the causal model and the control settings selected based on the baseline probability distributions; determining, for each of the possible values, a measure of a difference between a current system performance and a baseline system performance; and updating how frequently each of the possible values is sampled.