Causal Manufacturing Control for Changing Process Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for determining optimal control settings for manufacturing environments are either modeling-based, which passively observes historical data, or active control, which relies on experimentation, and neither effectively adapts to changing environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method implemented as a computer program that repeatedly selects configurations of input settings for manufacturing based on a causal model measuring relationships between input settings and product quality, adjusts the model based on product quality measurements, and considers internal control parameters and external variables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If modeling-based techniques are used to determine control settings, then the system can passively observe historical data and learn patterns, but the system cannot effectively adapt to changing environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static historical data analysis to dynamic active experimentation, where control settings are continuously adjusted based on real-time feedback from the manufacturing environment. This allows the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining pattern recognition capabilities through iterative learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where control settings are determined based on learned patterns, the results are observed, and the model is updated accordingly. This continuous feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing environmental conditions while maintaining accurate pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If active control techniques are used to determine control settings, then the system can generate knowledge through experimentation, but the system relies heavily on active intervention rather than passive learning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge generation capabilityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous operation by combining passive pattern recognition with active experimentation. Rather than requiring constant active intervention, the system continuously learns from both historical data and new experiments, maintaining knowledge generation while reducing operational complexity through automated iterative learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If the system repeatedly selects and tests different input settings, then the causal model can be quickly refined, but the manufacturing process requires frequent interruptions for measurement and adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecausal relationship accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial experimentation by selecting only the most promising input settings for testing based on the current state of the causal model. This reduces the number of interruptions needed while still achieving sufficient model refinement to maintain high manufacturing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250036112A1Manufacturing a product using causal models
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • US20250036112A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036112A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036112A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for optimizing a process of manufacturing a product. In one aspect, the method comprises repeatedly performing the following: i) selecting a configuration of input settings for manufacturing a product, based on a causal model that measures causal relationships between input settings and a measure of a quality of the product; ii) determining the measure of the quality of the product manufactured using the configuration of input settings; and iii) adjusting, based on the measure of the quality of the product manufactured using the configuration of input settings, the causal model.