CAV Intersection Priority Coordination Without Roadside Infrastructure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for managing Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) at intersections require specific infrastructure or high computational resources, especially when dealing with intersections without traffic lights or complex priority rules.

Innovation Solution

A method where CAVs independently compute and compare priority levels for each branch at an intersection, allowing for decentralized data processing and reduced data transmission, enabling efficient management without the need for specific infrastructure or high computational loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If specific infrastructure (communication and computing units) is deployed at crossing intersections to control CAVs, then the management of CAVs at intersections can be achieved, but the deployment is costly and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCAV intersection management capabilityVSAvoiddeployment cost and time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables CAVs to autonomously determine their own priority levels and make crossing decisions without requiring external infrastructure. Each CAV independently computes its priority based on local observations and communicates this information to other CAVs, allowing the system to self-organize and self-manage the intersection without dedicated control equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a communication protocol as an intermediary mechanism that allows CAVs to exchange priority information and coordinate their movements. This software-based intermediary replaces the need for physical infrastructure, enabling CAVs to negotiate right-of-way through message passing while maintaining system-wide coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If all CAVs at the intersection perform computation and data transmission, then comprehensive intersection management is achieved, but the computational load and data transmission requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintersection management comprehensivenessVSAvoidcomputational load and data transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computation task by having each CAV independently determine its own priority level based on its branch and local conditions, rather than requiring all CAVs to process all data. This segmentation reduces the computational burden on each individual vehicle and minimizes the amount of data that needs to be transmitted across the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for decision-making (priority levels) from the full set of vehicle data, and transmits only this extracted information between CAVs. This extraction principle reduces data transmission requirements while maintaining the comprehensiveness of intersection management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If CAVs compute priority levels independently for each branch, then flexibility and reduced data transmission are achieved, but coordination between different branches becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing flexibility and data transmission reductionVSAvoidcoordination complexity between branches
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex multi-dimensional vehicle state data into a simplified priority parameter that captures the essential information needed for coordination. By changing the representation from detailed vehicle states to aggregated priority levels, the system achieves computational flexibility and reduced data transmission while maintaining coordination capability through the priority comparison mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240274006A1Method for managing traffic of connected and automated vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US20240274006A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274006A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274006A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for managing traffic of connected and automated vehicles, CAV, at a road intersection comprising N branches, said method comprising: for each branch i of M branches among the N branches, with iϵ[1;M], M equal or greater than 2 and smaller or equal to N: obtaining by a CAV data related to vehicles in the i-th branch; determining by said CAV a i-th value relative to a level of priority of the i-th branch; comparing the i-th values; according to the result of the comparison, instructing a first CAV in one p-th branch among the M branches to enter a crossing area, CA, of the road intersection at a entering time.