Cavitation Barrier Control for Selective Fish Exclusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional exclusion structures, such as underwater fences, have failed to prevent the spread of Asian carp populations effectively, as they are costly, harmful to other species, and disrupt ecosystems, while existing deterrents are unwieldy and ineffective.

Innovation Solution

A cavitation barrier system using propellers to create a rotationally confined vertical column of cavitation bubbles, which acts as a non-physical deterrent that is sustainable and safe for humans, wildlife, and navigation, with a controller to adjust barrier strength for non-target species passage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional exclusion structures such as underwater fences are used to prevent Asian carp spread, then barrier function is provided, but the structures are costly, harmful to other species, and disrupt ecosystems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier effectivenessVSAvoidharm to wildlife and ecosystem
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical exclusion structures (fences, screens) with a hydrodynamic cavitation system. Propellers generate rotating cavitation bubbles that form a barrier invisible to humans and wildlife, eliminating physical obstructions and harmful mechanical interactions while maintaining effective carp deterrence through the cavitation zone's repulsive effect on fish

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces cavitation bubbles as an intermediary substance between the propeller and the carp. These bubbles create a zone of altered water pressure and density that repels carp without requiring direct contact between the propeller and the fish, thereby protecting wildlife while maintaining barrier functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If elaborate electric fences are deployed to block carp migration, then exclusion capability is enhanced, but the systems become unwieldy, expensive, and potentially harmful to navigation and infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexclusion capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex electrical systems with a simpler hydrodynamic system using propellers and cavitation. This substitution eliminates the need for electrical infrastructure, power transmission lines, and complex control systems while maintaining effective carp exclusion through the cavitation barrier

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the harmful and complex electrical components from the barrier system, retaining only the essential hydrodynamic function. By removing electrical fences, power supplies, and associated infrastructure, the system becomes simpler, cheaper, and safer for navigation while preserving carp exclusion capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If physical barriers are installed to prevent carp jump migration, then exclusion function is provided, but navigation and natural aquatic environment are disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexclusion functionVSAvoidnavigation and ecosystem compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical barriers with an invisible hydrodynamic field created by cavitation bubbles. This field effectively blocks carp migration through acoustic and pressure effects while remaining transparent to navigation and natural aquatic flows, eliminating disruptions to boats and ecosystem processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If cavitation barrier is used to exclude carp, then effective deterrence is achieved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeterrence effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic operation of the propellers, activating them only when carp detection is confirmed or during high-risk periods. This pulsed operation reduces energy consumption compared to continuous operation while maintaining effective deterrence when needed, balancing energy use with barrier reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively excludes Asian carp and other aquatic species without altering water chemistry or causing harm, while allowing non-target species to pass through, reducing the spread of invasive fish and protecting native ecosystems.

Implementation Method 1

at least drive unit comprising a motor and a propeller configured for inducing cavitation in water, the cavitation taking the form of a rotationally confined vertical column of cavitation bubbles extending from the propeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Implementation Method 2

The cavitation barrier offers a sustainable, long-term approach to exclusion of carp and other aquatic species

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic cavitation: Acoustic Cavitation

Data Source

PatentUS11751544B2Cavitation barrier for aquatic species
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 TSIKATA EDEM
  • US11751544B2 patent drawing
  • US11751544B2 patent drawing
  • US11751544B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention provide a novel deterrent barrier based on the phenomenon of fluid cavitation. A drive unit comprising a motor and a propeller are configured for inducing cavitation in water. The cavitation takes the form of a rotationally confined vertical column of cavitation bubbles extending from the propeller, and a one-dimensional series of drive units spanning the width of a waterway may provide an effective, environmentally friendly and non-lethal barrier against entry of target fish species.