Armor-Piercing Cavitation Projectile Nose Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional armor-piercing projectiles face challenges in penetrating barriers such as body armor and wet targets due to skin friction drag and hoop stress, which reduces their effectiveness at subsonic and transonic velocities.

Innovation Solution

The design of an armor-piercing cavitation projectile with a unique nose and body geometry, featuring a meplat with angular edges, a frustum with curved surfaces, and a cavitation groove, which utilizes supercavitation to reduce skin friction and enhance penetration by creating a bubble of gas around the projectile, allowing it to maintain velocity and cause deeper tissue damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional armor-piercing projectiles are used, then structural strength is maintained, but skin friction drag increases and penetration depth decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepenetration velocityVSAvoidskin friction drag
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an air bubble as an intermediary medium between the projectile and the water target. This bubble envelope acts as a mediator that separates the projectile surface from direct contact with water, thereby eliminating skin friction drag and enabling sustained high-velocity penetration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state of the environment around the projectile by creating a cavitation bubble (gas phase) instead of having the projectile move through liquid water. This parameter change from liquid to gas environment dramatically reduces drag forces while maintaining penetration capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If conventional projectile geometry is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but penetration effectiveness against body armor and wet targets is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepenetration capabilityVSAvoidprojectile geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different geometric characteristics to different parts of the projectile: the nose section has a specific ogive angle (30-60 degrees) optimized for cavitation initiation, while the body maintains a cylindrical shape for stability. This localized optimization of geometric properties enhances penetration without requiring complete redesign of the entire projectile

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a curved ogive nose shape with specific radius ratios instead of flat or angular geometries. The rounded curved surface is optimized to generate the pressure distribution necessary for cavitation bubble formation, improving penetration effectiveness while remaining manufacturable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Length of stationary object

If projectile velocity is increased to improve penetration, then penetration depth increases, but skin friction drag increases and velocity maintenance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepenetration depthVSAvoidenergy loss to skin friction
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The air bubble serves as a continuous intermediary that reduces energy transfer from the projectile to the water through skin friction. By maintaining this gas-phase envelope during high-velocity travel, the projectile preserves kinetic energy that would otherwise be lost to drag, enabling deeper penetration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical interaction between projectile surface and water (direct contact friction) with a fluid dynamic system where an air bubble envelope mediates the interaction. This substitution eliminates skin friction losses that would otherwise convert kinetic energy into heat and turbulence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The projectile effectively penetrates barriers like Kevlar helmets and achieves deep penetration in wet targets by minimizing skin friction and maximizing tissue damage through the creation of a cavitation bubble and hydraulic force, outperforming conventional projectiles in terms of penetration depth and wound cavity size.

Implementation Method 1

In water, cavitation occurs when water pressure is lowered below the water's vapor pressure, thus forming bubbles of vapor around the object, thus reducing skin friction.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Implementation Method 2

Supercavitation is the use of cavitation effects to create a bubble of gas inside a liquid large enough to envelope an object travelling through the liquid, greatly reducing the skin friction drag on the object and enabling achievement of very high speeds.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSupercavitation: Supercavitation

Data Source

PatentUS10036619B2Armor-piercing cavitation projectile
Publication Date: 2018.07.31 LEHIGH DEFENSE LLC
  • US10036619B2 patent drawing
  • US10036619B2 patent drawing
  • US10036619B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A projectile has a body with an axis and a meplat disposed substantially orthogonal to the axis. The meplat is bounded by a substantially square edge.