Cavitation Threshold Characterization via Sonoluminescence Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current acoustically enhanced cleaning processes lack real-time feedback to control cavitation levels, leading to potential damage to sensitive substrates and inefficiencies in particle removal, as transient cavitation is difficult to detect and manage.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that characterize cavitation properties by measuring photon emission during sonoluminescence, using a photomultiplier tube or hydrophone to detect and quantify cavitation, and adjusting power levels to maintain stable cavitation, thereby preventing surface damage and optimizing cleaning efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If acoustic energy is increased to improve particle removal efficiency, then cleaning effectiveness improves, but transient cavitation occurs causing surface damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle removal efficiencyVSAvoidsurface damage from transient cavitation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a photomultiplier tube to detect sonoluminescence emitted during cavitation events, providing real-time feedback on cavitation intensity. This feedback loop allows the control system to adjust acoustic power levels to maintain effective cleaning while preventing excessive cavitation that causes surface damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts acoustic power parameters based on detected sonoluminescence intensity. By changing the power level parameter in response to real-time cavitation measurements, the system optimizes the balance between cleaning effectiveness and surface protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If acoustic power is reduced to prevent surface damage, then surface safety improves, but particle removal efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface damage preventionVSAvoidparticle removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time detection of sonoluminescence provides feedback that allows the system to operate at the optimal power threshold - high enough for effective cleaning but low enough to prevent surface damage from excessive transient cavitation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If acoustic energy is transmitted into the process fluid, then cleaning and plating processes are enhanced, but transient cavitation may cause harmful effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning and plating process enhancementVSAvoidtransient cavitation effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The photomultiplier tube detects sonoluminescence from cavitation events and provides real-time feedback to the control system, enabling dynamic adjustment of acoustic power to maintain beneficial cavitation effects while avoiding harmful transient cavitation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces direct mechanical measurement of cavitation with optical detection of sonoluminescence. This substitution allows for non-intrusive, real-time monitoring of cavitation intensity without interfering with the acoustic field or mechanical cleaning process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time control of cavitation levels, reducing surface damage and improving particle removal efficiency by maintaining stable cavitation, even in low-power cleaning processes, and optimizing chemical consumption and process efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

Sonoluminescence (SL) is the light released when the bubble collapses or more precisely, implodes. The pressure and speed of the implosion raises the gas inside the bubble to sufficiently high temperatures to cause emission of photons.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSonoluminescence: Sonoluminescence

Implementation Method 2

Acoustic cavitation is generally regarded as the principle mechanism for particle removal in the cleaning process. In an acoustic field, a bubble or cavity is created when the high pressure tears the fluid, creating a bubble or void.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic cavitation: Acoustic Cavitation

Implementation Method 3

The acoustic energy is commonly generated by exciting a piezoelectric crystal with a sinusoidal AC voltage. The crystal changes dimension at a rate determined by the frequency of the AC voltage. These periodic dimensional changes are mechanical vibrations, the energy from which is coupled into the process fluid through a resonator plate, thus creating an acoustic energy field.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS7443079B2Method and apparatus for cavitation threshold characterization and control
Publication Date: 2008.10.28 PROD SYST LLC
  • US7443079B2 patent drawing
  • US7443079B2 patent drawing
  • US7443079B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for characterizing cavitation that occurs in a fluid exposed to acoustic energy. The apparatus comprises a vessel for holding the fluid; an acoustic energy generating means for generating acoustic energy, the acoustic energy generating means being positioned to transmit the acoustic energy into the fluid while the fluid is held in the vessel; and a cavitation detection means for detecting cavitation in the fluid held in the vessel. In a preferred embodiment, the cavitation detection means comprises a light detection means, such as a photomultiplier tube, that detects sonoluminescent emission from the fluid. The method comprises the steps of exposing a volume of process fluid to acoustic energy at a specified power level; measuring the photon output from the fluid over a period of time; and when the photon output deviates from a desired level, initiating a remedial step to bring the photon output back to approximately the desired level.