Cone-Beam CT Artifact Correction via Material Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems face challenges in accurately reconstructing images due to cone-beam artifacts, especially at larger cone angles, which interfere with diagnosis and require lengthy processing times for effective correction.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that separate high-density and low-density material images from a CBCT image, iteratively subtracting a reproduced cone-beam artifact image to correct for artifacts, using a thresholding method and median filter to enhance accuracy and speed, allowing for quick removal of cone-beam artifacts even at larger cone angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If an iterative approach is used to reduce cone-beam artifacts, then artifact reduction performance is improved, but processing time increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartifact reduction performanceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing material separation and scalar value calculation before the main artifact reduction process. The high-density material image is separated and its scalar value is computed in advance, allowing the iterative subtraction process to start with pre-prepared data, thus reducing overall processing time while maintaining artifact reduction effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the image into high-density and low-density material components using thresholding. This segmentation allows different processing strategies to be applied to different material types, with the high-density material (which causes cone-beam artifacts) being separately identified and processed through scalar value subtraction, improving both speed and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If a two-pass algorithm is used to reduce computation time, then processing speed is improved, but correction performance is degraded at greater cone angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation speedVSAvoidcorrection performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic iterative correction process that adapts to different cone angles. Instead of using a fixed two-pass algorithm, the system performs multiple iterations of scalar value subtraction, where the number of iterations can be adjusted based on the cone angle. For larger cone angles, more iterations are performed to maintain correction performance while still being faster than traditional methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters including the threshold value for material separation and the scalar value used in subtraction. By dynamically adjusting these parameters based on the specific imaging conditions and cone angle, the system optimizes both processing speed and correction performance for different clinical scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If a large-area X-ray detector is used to image large volumes, then imaging coverage is improved, but cone-beam artifacts become more severe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging coverageVSAvoidcone-beam artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the harmful cone-beam artifact component from the reconstructed image. By separating the high-density material that causes artifacts and subtracting its scalar value contribution, the system effectively takes out the harmful factor while preserving the useful diagnostic information from the large-area detector imaging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of high-density materials (which generate cone-beam artifacts) into a beneficial process. By identifying these materials through thresholding and using their scalar values for subtraction, the system transforms the artifact-source into a correction tool, where the same high-density materials that cause problems are used to guide the correction process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS11213260B2Method and apparatus for correcting cone-beam artifact in cone-beam computed tomography image, and cone-beam computed tomography apparatus including the same
Publication Date: 2022.01.04 IND ACADEMIC COOP FOUND YONSEI UNIV
  • US11213260B2 patent drawing
  • US11213260B2 patent drawing
  • US11213260B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a technique for quickly removing and correcting a cone-beam artifact generated in a computed tomography (CT) image in consideration of bone and soft tissue regions when using a large-area X-ray detector in order to reduce a CT imaging time for large volumes in a cone-beam CT system. An apparatus includes an input unit configured to receive a start image including a cone-beam artifact, a computation unit configured to separate a high-density material image and a low-density material image from the start image received by the input unit, generate a reproduced image in which the cone-beam artifact is reproduced using the low-density material image, execute a correction process for subtracting the reproduced image from the start image to generate a corrected image, and iterate the correction process using the corrected image as a start image; and an output unit configured to output a final corrected image generated.