Selective Cbl-b Inhibitor Compounds for Immune Response Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for effective inhibitors targeting Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (Cbl) proteins, specifically Cbl-b, to modulate immune responses and treat conditions mediated by Cbl-b, such as cancer.

Innovation Solution

Development of compounds represented by Formula I and Formula II, which inhibit Cbl-b activity, enhance immune cell activity, and treat diseases mediated by Cbl-b, including cancer, through administration to a subject.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If small-molecule inhibitors are developed against Cbl-b to modulate immune responses, then therapeutic efficacy for cancer and immune-mediated conditions is improved, but development complexity and validation requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoiddevelopment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the validation process into distinct phases: in vitro validation using defined cell lines and assays, in vivo validation using controlled animal models, and clinical translation protocols. This segmentation allows systematic evaluation of Cbl-b inhibitors while managing development complexity through structured milestones and criteria for progression to next stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs intermediary validation models including defined cell lines (e.g., Cbl-b dependent cancer cell lines), animal models with controlled Cbl-b expression, and preclinical assay systems. These intermediaries bridge the gap between basic Cbl-b biology and clinical application, enabling rigorous efficacy assessment before human trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If selective Cbl-b inhibitors are developed to enhance immune cell activity, then immune response modulation is improved, but off-target effects and safety issues may arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response modulationVSAvoidoff-target effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent emphasizes developing inhibitors with selective activity specifically against Cbl-b rather than pan-E3 ligases or other targets. This local quality approach ensures that immune modulation is achieved through Cbl-b-specific mechanisms while minimizing off-target effects on other ubiquitin ligases, immune cells, or non-immune tissues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces broad-spectrum immunomodulatory approaches with a more precise molecular mechanism targeting Cbl-b's specific role in immune regulation. By substituting non-specific immune stimulation with targeted Cbl-b inhibition, the therapy achieves adaptability in immune response modulation while eliminating harmful off-target effects associated with non-specific approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If preclinical validation models are established for Cbl-b inhibitors, then efficacy assessment is improved, but time and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficacy assessmentVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes defined cell lines and preclinical models before inhibitor development begins. These preliminary action models include Cbl-b dependent cancer cell lines with characterized phenotypes and animal models with controlled Cbl-b expression, enabling immediate and precise efficacy assessment once inhibitors are synthesized, thereby reducing overall validation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops multi-functional validation models that can assess multiple aspects of inhibitor efficacy simultaneously. For example, defined cell lines can evaluate both proliferation inhibition and immune modulation effects, while animal models can assess tumor efficacy and safety in a single study design, reducing the number of separate validation experiments required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260028336A1Cbl-b inhibitors and methods of use thereof
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 ARCUS BIOSCIENCES INC
  • US20260028336A1 patent drawing
  • US20260028336A1 patent drawing
  • US20260028336A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are compounds that are Cbl-b inhibitors having a structure according to Formula (II), and compositions containing those compounds. Methods of preparing the compounds, and methods of using the compounds for the treatment of diseases, disorders, or conditions are also described.