Coalbed Methane Well Productivity Determination Without Shutdown

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for determining the deliverability equation of coalbed methane wells without shutting down the well are difficult to apply due to the requirement of maintaining constant formation pressure and stabilized seepage state, which is challenging in coalbed methane wells with low permeability, leading to significant changes in formation pressure and prolonged stabilization times.

Innovation Solution

A method involving obtaining coalbed methane PVT experimental data, performing stabilized bottomhole flow pressure tests under constant production conditions, determining a relationship between pressure and pseudo-pressure, and iteratively calculating formation pressures using a binomial deliverability equation to determine the productivity of the well without shutting it down.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional well test method is used to determine deliverability equation, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity is reduced due to well shutdown

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeliverability equation determination accuracyVSAvoidwell production
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous production testing without well shutdown by using material balance equations to calculate formation pressure changes during production. This allows the deliverability equation to be determined while the well remains in continuous production mode, eliminating the need to stop production for pressure buildup tests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Productivity

If conventional method without shutdown is used, then productivity is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to formation pressure changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewell production continuityVSAvoidformation pressure constancy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses material balance equations to continuously calculate formation pressure based on cumulative production data, creating a feedback mechanism that accounts for pressure changes during production. This allows accurate deliverability equation determination despite formation pressure varying during the test period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the approach by using pseudo-pressure and material balance relationships to account for formation pressure changes. Instead of requiring constant formation pressure, the method incorporates pressure changes into the calculation framework through iterative solutions of the deliverability equation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If stabilized flow pressure test is performed under multiple production conditions, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to stabilization period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeliverability equation accuracyVSAvoidstabilization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary production data and material balance calculations to estimate formation pressure at different production stages, eliminating the need to wait for full stabilization. By performing preliminary calculations based on cumulative production, the method determines deliverability parameters without requiring complete stabilization at each test point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If well shutdown is performed for conventional testing, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to water flooding issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeliverability equation determinationVSAvoidwell restart difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuous production throughout the testing process, eliminating well shutdowns that cause water flooding problems. By using material balance equations to account for pressure changes during continuous production, the method avoids the operational difficulties of shutting down and restarting high-volume fracturing wells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240093604A1Method for determining productivity of coalbed methane well without shutting down the well
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 EXPLORATION & PROD RES INST OF SINOPEC NORTH-CHINA OIL & GAS CO
  • US20240093604A1 patent drawing
  • US20240093604A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a productivity of a coalbed methane well without shutting down the well includes steps of: obtaining coalbed methane basic data; based on PVT experimental data, determining a relationship table between a pressure and a coalbed methane deviation factor, and a relationship table between the pressure and a pseudo-pressure; recording daily gas production rates, bottomhole flow pressures, and cumulative gas productions at each stabilized flow pressure test moment in at least three different production stages; determining formation pressures corresponding to each stabilized flow pressure test moment based on a material balance equation; according to the formation pressures, the bottomhole flow pressures and the production rates, determining coefficients in a deliverability equation of the coalbed methane well for determining the deliverability equation; substituting the formation pressures and the bottomhole flow pressures into the deliverability equation for obtaining corresponding productivity.