CBRS Interference Classification for Spectrum Utilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band, existing technologies face challenges in effectively managing interference between Citizens Broadband Radio Service Devices (CBSDs) operating in different channels, radio access technologies, and with overlapping downlink and uplink cycles, leading to potential interference issues despite the use of guard bands or other mitigation tools.

Innovation Solution

A network node, such as a Spectrum Access System (SAS) or Coexistence Manager (CxM), classifies interference connections based on calculated interference levels and performs actions like channel assignments to mitigate interference. This involves determining if CBSDs are operating in alternate, adjacent, or the same channels, and applying policies to reduce interference, including using static, dynamic, or probabilistic thresholds to manage interference levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple CBSDs operate in the CBRS band with different radio access technologies and overlapping downlink/uplink cycles, then spectrum utilization and productivity are improved, but interference between CBSDs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectrum utilizationVSAvoidinterference between CBSDs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments CBSDs into different interference connection types (Type 1, Type 2, Type 3) based on their interference characteristics. Type 1 connections require strict orthogonal resource allocation, Type 2 connections allow partial overlap with mitigation, and Type 3 connections permit flexible sharing. This segmentation enables the system to maximize spectrum utilization for compatible CBSDs while applying appropriate interference protection measures only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic interference management by continuously monitoring interference levels and adjusting resource allocation policies in real-time. The system can dynamically transition CBSDs between different interference connection types based on current network conditions, traffic demands, and interference measurements, allowing optimal spectrum utilization while maintaining interference thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If guard bands are used to mitigate interference between adjacent channels, then interference is reduced, but spectrum efficiency and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference between adjacent channelsVSAvoidspectrum efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of channel separation from fixed guard bands to variable interference thresholds. Instead of always allocating full guard bands between channels, the system calculates actual interference levels and adjusts the effective separation requirement dynamically. This allows minimal or no guard bands when interference is naturally low, while applying larger separations only when needed, thereby maximizing spectrum efficiency while maintaining interference protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If CBSDs are assigned orthogonal channels to avoid interference, then interference is minimized, but channel availability and productivity for each CBSD are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference between CBSDsVSAvoidchannel availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different CBSD pairs with different interference management policies based on their specific characteristics. Rather than enforcing uniform orthogonal channel allocation across all CBSDs, the system identifies pairs with compatible characteristics (e.g., different RATs, non-overlapping cycles) and allows them to share channels, while applying strict orthogonal allocation only to incompatible pairs. This localized approach maximizes overall channel availability while maintaining interference protection where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11617087B2Method and apparatus for handling interference connection types in citizens broadband radio service devices band
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11617087B2 patent drawing
  • US11617087B2 patent drawing
  • US11617087B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and network node for classification of interference connections between Citizens Broadband Radio Service Devices, CBSDs, in a wireless communication network are provided. According to one aspect, a method includes calculating an interference level, the calculation being based on whether two interfering CBSDs are operating in one of the alternate channels, adjacent channels and the same channel. The method also includes comparing the calculated interference level to a threshold to determine a classification of an interference connection.