CCE Partitioning for Uplink Downlink Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, the allocation of control channel resources for uplink and downlink user data communications in FDMA systems leads to CCE blocking, which adversely affects cell throughput due to the need for concurrent UL and DL CCE assignments, and existing methods either result in equal blocking probabilities or higher UL blocking probabilities.

Innovation Solution

Partitioning CCEs into exclusive uplink and downlink sub-sets, allowing for non-concurrent allocation processing and reducing blocking probabilities by organizing CCEs into groups that can be pseudo-randomly or alternately assigned to either direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CCE resources are allocated to UL and DL users in turn with equal probability, then the blocking probability is balanced between UL and DL, but the overall cell throughput is reduced due to concurrent allocation constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking probability balanceVSAvoidcell throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The CCE resources are segmented into multiple groups, where each group can be independently allocated to either UL or DL users. This segmentation allows the system to avoid concurrent allocation conflicts while maintaining balanced blocking probabilities, as each group can be assigned to the direction with higher priority or lower blocking probability at that moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The allocation of CCE groups to UL or DL is made dynamic rather than static. The system can adaptively adjust which groups are allocated to which direction based on real-time conditions, such as traffic demand and blocking probabilities, thereby optimizing cell throughput while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If DL users are allocated CCEs first until a threshold is reached, then UL users are assigned remaining CCEs, then UL blocking probability increases, but concurrent allocation processing is not required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveallocation processing simplicityVSAvoidUL blocking probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting CCE resources into multiple groups, the system ensures that UL users have access to dedicated groups rather than relying on remaining resources after DL allocation. This segmentation guarantees a minimum level of resource availability for UL, reducing blocking probability while maintaining simple sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different CCE groups can have different allocation characteristics tailored to specific needs. For example, some groups can be preferentially allocated to UL when UL traffic demand is high, while others can be allocated to DL when DL demand is high, creating local optimization without complex concurrent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If CCEs are partitioned into exclusive UL and DL sub-sets, then blocking probabilities are reduced for both directions, but the flexibility of CCE allocation is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking probability reductionVSAvoidCCE allocation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The CCE resources are segmented into multiple groups that can be flexibly assigned to UL or DL. This segmentation provides a middle ground between exclusive partitioning and completely shared allocation, reducing blocking probabilities by ensuring dedicated resources while maintaining flexibility through dynamic group assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each CCE group serves multiple purposes and can be allocated to either UL or DL based on demand. This multi-functionality allows the system to reduce blocking probabilities by providing dedicated groups while maintaining allocation flexibility, as the same groups can serve different directions at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8694013B2Resource allocation signalling
Publication Date: 2014.04.08 NEC CORP
  • US8694013B2 patent drawing
  • US8694013B2 patent drawing
  • US8694013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile telecommunications system is described in which a base station allocates control channel elements for signalling resource allocation data for a number of mobile telephones. The CCEs are partitioned into at least two groups, one for uplink allocations and one for downlink allocations. In one embodiment, the group size is fixed while in another embodiment, the group size changes between sub-frames. In another embodiment, the group size is varied in a pseudo-random manner.