CCR8 Binders Targeting Extracellular Loops for Tumor Immunity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cancer treatments targeting human CCR8 often require binding to the N-terminal region, limiting their effectiveness and specificity, and existing antibodies are not cross-reactive with non-human primate CCR8, hindering in vivo testing and human cancer therapy.

Innovation Solution

Development of novel human CCR8 binders that target extracellular loops 2 and 3, specifically binding to human CCR8 and cross-reacting with non-human primate CCR8, utilizing single-domain antibody moieties with specific CDR sequences and framework regions, and incorporating cytotoxic moieties for ADCC, ADCP, or CDC activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against human CCR8 are developed for cancer therapy, then anti-tumour immunity is enhanced, but the antibodies must bind to the N-terminal region which limits their effectiveness and specificity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness and specificity of CCR8 bindingVSAvoidbinding region flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of binding to the conventional N-terminal region, the invention targets the C-terminal region of CCR8. This inverted approach to epitope selection allows the antibodies to achieve both high effectiveness and broad adaptability, resolving the contradiction between binding specificity and regional flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the binding parameter from N-terminal to C-terminal region of CCR8. This parameter change enables the antibodies to maintain high affinity and specificity while gaining versatility in neutralizing different CCR8 variants and functions, thereby resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If existing anti-CCR8 antibodies are used, then cancer therapy is pursued, but they are not cross-reactive with non-human primate CCR8, hindering in vivo testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman cancer therapy effectivenessVSAvoidcross-reactivity with non-human primate CCR8
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The C-terminal targeting approach creates antibodies with universal applicability across species. The anti-CCR8 antibodies of the invention can bind to both human and non-human primate CCR8, enabling them to serve dual purposes: human cancer therapy and preclinical in vivo testing in primate models, thus resolving the contradiction between species-specificity and cross-reactivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If Treg cells are depleted in the tumour microenvironment, then anti-tumour immunity is enhanced, but systemic removal of Treg cells may elicit autoimmunity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-tumour immunity enhancementVSAvoidautoimmunity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The C-terminal targeting antibodies exhibit local action within the tumour microenvironment rather than systemic distribution. By concentrating the depleting effect specifically where CCR8-expressing Treg cells infiltrate the tumour, the therapy enhances anti-tumour immunity locally while preserving peripheral Treg cells that maintain immune tolerance, thereby resolving the contradiction between tumour immunity enhancement and autoimmunity prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These binders effectively deplete tumour-infiltrating regulatory T-cells, enhancing anti-tumour immunity and augmenting the effects of checkpoint inhibitors, while allowing for in vivo testing in animal models and potential human cancer therapy.

Implementation Method 1

WO2018/181425 suggests that, in mice, a neutralizing anti-CCR8 mAb is able to deplete Treg cells in tumour tissues by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAntibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC):

Data Source

PatentUS20240076391A1Human CCR8 binders
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 VLAAMS INTERUNIVERSITAIR INST VOOR BIOTECHNOLOGIE VZW
  • US20240076391A1 patent drawing
  • US20240076391A1 patent drawing
  • US20240076391A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to human CCR8 (hCCR8) binders, wherein the hCCR8 binder is cross-reactive with a non-human primate CCR8. Such binders are particularly useful for the depletion of intra-tumoural regulatory T-cells and immunotherapy in general.