CDR Sampling Edge Control Using Adaptive Phase Offset

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for high-speed signal recovery in digital communications systems, particularly in fiber optic links, face challenges in accurately adapting the sampling edge position due to signal degradation caused by dispersion, leading to inefficiencies and impractical power consumption in current circuit implementations.

Innovation Solution

A differential sampling edge position control circuit that generates advanced and delayed clock signals to sample high-speed data signals, compare these with current signals, and adjust the sampling edge position using an analog phase offset control signal, implemented in a Phase Lock Loop-based Clock and Data Recovery (CDR) circuit to improve signal recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If advanced and delayed sampling is used to detect sampling edge position errors, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling edge position detection precisionVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sampling process is segmented into three distinct operations: advanced sampling, current sampling, and delayed sampling. Each sampling operation uses a dedicated sampler circuit that is sequentially activated by the control signal. This segmentation allows precise measurement of sampling edge position errors by comparing results from different sampling timings, while keeping each individual sampler circuit simple and modular.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control signal operates periodically to sequentially control the advanced, current, and delayed samplers. This periodic activation pattern enables the system to cycle through different sampling operations at predetermined time intervals, allowing error detection and correction to occur in a systematic, repeating sequence that maintains measurement precision without requiring all samplers to operate simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If multiple samplers (advanced, current, delayed) are used to detect sampling errors, then reliability is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal recovery reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control signal activates the advanced, current, and delayed samplers in a periodic sequence rather than simultaneously. This time-division approach allows multiple sampling operations to be performed using the same hardware resources at different time intervals, improving reliability through multiple measurement opportunities while significantly reducing power consumption compared to having all samplers active at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own sampling operations to generate the error detection information needed for correction. By sequentially sampling at advanced, current, and delayed times and comparing results, the system self-diagnoses sampling edge position errors and generates correction signals without requiring external monitoring equipment, thereby improving reliability while minimizing additional power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If sampling edge position is adaptively controlled, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery accuracyVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the results from advanced, current, and delayed samplers are compared to detect sampling edge position errors. This error detection feeds into a control signal generator that produces correction signals, which are then applied to adjust the sampling timing. This closed-loop feedback system automatically adapts the sampling edge position to maximize data recovery accuracy without requiring complex manual intervention or overly sophisticated control circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control signal is designed to preliminarily adjust the sampling edge position based on predicted error patterns from dispersion effects. By proactively compensating for expected sampling timing errors before they degrade signal quality, the system maintains high data recovery accuracy. This preliminary correction action reduces the need for complex real-time adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7529329B2Circuit for adaptive sampling edge position control and a method therefor
Publication Date: 2009.05.05 MACOM CONNECTIVITY SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US7529329B2 patent drawing
  • US7529329B2 patent drawing
  • US7529329B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A clock and data recovery circuit (CDR) for receiving high-speed digital data, and having an analog phase offset control capability, is improved by providing an adaptive sampling edge position control. A differential circuit samples the raw data signal at three closely spaced sampling points of the eye, and compares advanced and delayed sampled data with the nominal sampled data. If either the advanced or delayed sampled data differ from the nominal sampled data, i.e. if advanced or delayed errors are detected, a shift in the sampling edge position may be required. A logic circuit performs a method determining the occurrence of advanced or delayed errors over progressively longer time intervals, and to adjust the sampling edge position of the CDR by controlling the phase offset.