CDR3–Epitope Chemical Scoring for Autoimmune Disease Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for diagnosing and treating autoimmune diseases are inefficient and lack the ability to accurately distinguish between individuals with and without autoimmune diseases, and there is a need for improved computational analyses to monitor disease activity.

Innovation Solution

A method involving chemical complementarity scoring is used to determine the interaction between immunoglobulin heavy chain complementarity determining regions (CDR3) and autoimmune disease epitopes, utilizing electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions to identify and treat autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis and celiac disease, through the administration of therapeutic agents when a specific complementarity score is increased.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current immunotherapy methods are used to treat autoimmune diseases, then treatment can be provided, but the ability to accurately distinguish patients with autoimmune diseases from healthy individuals is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoiddisease distinction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of measurement from general immune response assessment to specific electrostatic and hydrophobic interaction scoring between CDR3 regions and epitopes. By quantifying chemical complementarity scores and comparing them against control subjects, the method achieves more precise and reliable differentiation between autoimmune disease patients and healthy individuals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If targeted immunotherapies blocking inflammatory cytokines and cell surface molecules are used, then pro-inflammatory signaling pathways are suppressed, but efficient computational analyses for diagnosis and disease monitoring remain challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex computational immune repertoire analysis with a simplified electrostatic and hydrophobic interaction scoring system. By focusing on specific chemical properties (electrostatic potential, hydrophobicity) of CDR3-epitope interactions, the method maintains treatment effectiveness while reducing computational complexity for clinical diagnosis and monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If general autoimmune disease treatments are administered, then broad immune suppression is achieved, but the ability to monitor disease activity and distinguish affected individuals remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisease monitoring reliabilityVSAvoiddisease activity information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by calculating complementarity scores from patient samples and comparing them against control subjects. This scoring system provides quantitative feedback on disease presence and activity level, enabling reliable monitoring and distinction between affected and unaffected individuals through measurable electrostatic and hydrophobic interaction differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune diseases by identifying increased complementarity scores, enabling targeted therapeutic interventions.

Implementation Method 1

determining a complementarity score (CS) between the IGH CDR3 and an epitope of the autoimmune disease, wherein the CS is based on electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between the IGH CDR3 and the epitope

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic interactions: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

determining a complementarity score (CS) between the IGH CDR3 and an epitope of the autoimmune disease, wherein the CS is based on electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between the IGH CDR3 and the epitope

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic interactions: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentUS20250279160A1Methods of Using Chemical Complementarity Scoring
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA
  • US20250279160A1 patent drawing
  • US20250279160A1 patent drawing
  • US20250279160A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates methods of treating, preventing, and/or diagnosing autoimmune diseases using chemical complementarity scoring.