CE Device Home Energy Management Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current home energy management systems lack effective user interfaces and automated control mechanisms to efficiently monitor and reduce energy consumption, particularly in residential settings, and do not facilitate comparison with neighbor's energy usage for competitive savings.

Innovation Solution

A consumer electronics device with a processor and video display that presents a user interface showing energy usage by room, allows users to define energy-saving rules, and compares energy consumption with neighbors, enabling automated control of appliances and tailored energy-efficient appliance advertisements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual control of energy-using devices is used, then users can directly control individual devices, but users must repeatedly operate devices manually which is inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of device controlVSAvoidtime for manual operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically controlling energy-using devices based on pre-set conditions and user preferences. The microprocessor monitors sensor data and automatically adjusts devices without requiring manual user intervention, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The energy management system provides self-service functionality where the microprocessor and sensors automatically monitor conditions and control devices based on programmed rules. The system serves itself by making autonomous decisions about device operation, eliminating the need for repeated manual user operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If automated local control is implemented, then repeating manual operation is avoided, but the system requires complex automation mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of device controlVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated control system is segmented into independent functional modules: sensors for monitoring environmental conditions, a microprocessor for logical decision-making, and actuators for device control. Each module performs a specific function, which simplifies the overall system design and maintenance while providing comprehensive automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The microprocessor-based control system serves multiple functions: it monitors sensor data, processes logical conditions, controls various energy-using devices, and provides user interface operations. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be multiple separate systems into a single versatile controller, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If remote control via service provider is used, then devices can be controlled remotely, but customer privacy and control autonomy are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote device control capabilityVSAvoidcustomer control autonomy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides dynamic control where the level of automation and remote intervention can be adjusted based on customer preferences. Users can program different levels of autonomy for different devices or time periods, allowing the system to adapt between fully automatic operation and manual control modes, thus maintaining customer autonomy while providing remote control capability when desired.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of information

If detailed energy monitoring is implemented, then users can see energy consumption data, but the user interface becomes complex and difficult to navigate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumption information availabilityVSAvoiduser interface simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface segments energy consumption information by functional categories such as rooms, device types, or time periods. This organization allows users to access detailed energy data in a structured, easy-to-navigate format rather than presenting all data at once, thus maintaining information availability while improving interface simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system presents energy consumption data across multiple dimensions including temporal (historical vs. current), spatial (different rooms or devices), and categorical (different device types) perspectives. This multi-dimensional presentation allows users to understand energy consumption patterns without overwhelming the interface with raw data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8589816B2CE device for home energy management
Publication Date: 2013.11.19 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US8589816B2 patent drawing
  • US8589816B2 patent drawing
  • US8589816B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A CE device employs user interfaces to allow a user to define energy management rules within the user's premises, visualize energy use in the home and in neighbor's homes for comparison and competition in saving energy, and receive tailored advertisements for appliances that are more energy efficient than what the user currently owns.