Ceiling-Ducted Containment Airflow Balancing to Reduce Fan Power

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data centers face challenges in efficiently managing airflow and power consumption due to increased power density and cooling requirements, leading to inefficiencies in cooling systems and increased energy costs.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for balancing airflow in ceiling-ducted containment systems using differential pressure measurements, adjustable dampers, and a flow-network-based software tool to optimize airflow and reduce fan speeds, thereby minimizing backpressure and energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If fan speed is increased to meet cooling demand, then cooling capacity is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidfan power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the airflow resistance parameter by adjusting damper positions to optimize the relationship between fan speed and cooling capacity. By modifying the resistance characteristics of the airflow path, the system can achieve required cooling with lower fan power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses differential pressure sensors to monitor airflow conditions and provides feedback to the control system. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of damper positions and fan speeds to maintain optimal cooling efficiency while minimizing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If airflow resistance is increased to control airflow distribution, then airflow balancing is improved, but backpressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow balancingVSAvoidbackpressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different airflow resistance characteristics to different zones by independently controlling damper positions in various containment pods. This allows precise airflow balancing in each location while distributing backpressure effects throughout the system rather than concentrating them in one area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The airflow system is divided into multiple independent containment pods with individually controllable dampers. This segmentation allows localized airflow adjustment and balances the distribution of backpressure across multiple zones, preventing excessive pressure buildup in any single location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of energy

If damper positions are adjusted to balance airflow, then cooling efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs multiple functions using a single integrated platform: it reads differential pressure sensor data, calculates optimal damper positions, controls damper actuators, and monitors fan speeds. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate control systems and simplifies overall system architecture despite the complexity of airflow balancing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves energy savings by reducing fan power consumption and improving cooling-system efficiency through optimized airflow balancing, resulting in significant energy savings and enhanced cooling performance.

Implementation Method 1

A differential pressure sensor may be used to determine when the hot aisle containment is balanced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential pressure measurement: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

A flow-network-based software tool may be used to determine optimal damper positions and total cooling airflow required to balance a ceiling-ducted hot aisle containment system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure-driven airflow: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11582887B2Methods of balancing airflow in ceiling-ducted containment systems
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IT CORP
  • US11582887B2 patent drawing
  • US11582887B2 patent drawing
  • US11582887B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One aspect is directed to a system for controlling airflow in a facility having a ceiling-ducted aisle airflow containment system having a first damper system for controlling airflow. The system includes an input to receive parameters related to airflow in the facility, wherein the parameters include at least one airflow resistance value for a device in the facility, an output to provide output data including at least one setting for one or more controllable devices in the facility, and one or more processors configured to receive the parameters related to airflow, determine airflow values associated with the airflow containment system and based on the airflow values, generate the at least one setting for the one or more controllable devices, including at least one setting for the first damper system.