Automated Cell Culture Imaging for Scalable Quality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biological manufacturing processes, particularly those involving mammalian cells, suffer from variability, inefficiency, high labor intensity, and scalability issues due to the stochastic nature of cell processes, manual intervention, and lack of objective quality evaluation, leading to high costs and unscalable production.

Innovation Solution

An automated cell culture system with integrated cell imaging, computing, and editing subsystems for objective quality assessment and control, using machine learning for image analysis, and a closed-environment modular system for sterile manufacturing, enabling efficient and scalable production of high-quality cell products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual cell culture management is used with trained operators making selective transfers, then cell quality can be monitored and edited, but the process becomes expensive, unscalable, and labor intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell quality controlVSAvoidmanufacturing scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical manipulation of cells and colonies with automated imaging systems and computational algorithms. Machine learning models analyze cell culture images to identify and select target cells for editing, eliminating the need for trained operators to manually observe and manipulate cells under microscopes. This substitution enables objective, consistent quality control without the labor intensity and subjectivity of manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables cell cultures to self-monitor and self-report their quality status through automated imaging and machine learning analysis. The computational models continuously evaluate cell morphology, growth patterns, and other quality parameters, automatically identifying deviations without human intervention. This self-service approach allows the cell culture process to autonomously detect and report quality issues, freeing operators from routine monitoring tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If frequent transfers between cell culture containers are performed, then cell density can be managed and quality maintained, but the process becomes labor intensive and increases contamination risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell quality maintenanceVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback loops where automated imaging systems monitor cell culture quality parameters in real-time, and machine learning models analyze the data to determine when editing is needed. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain cell quality by selectively removing deviant cells based on objective criteria rather than relying on scheduled transfers. The feedback-driven approach reduces the frequency and complexity of manual intervention while maintaining reliable quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If subjective decision making by operators is used for cell selection, then flexibility in handling variability is achieved, but variability and subjectivity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess flexibilityVSAvoidquality assessment objectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the quality assessment process from subjective operator judgment to objective parameter-based evaluation. Machine learning models quantify cell quality using measurable parameters such as morphology, growth rate, and colony size extracted from images. These objective parameters replace subjective human judgment, enabling consistent and reproducible quality assessment across different operators and time points while maintaining the ability to adapt to variability through adjustable parameter thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If multiple purification and sorting steps are added, then cell product quality is improved, but yield and viability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidcell yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs quality assessment and cell selection early in the cell culture process using automated imaging and machine learning analysis. By identifying and removing deviant cells during culture growth rather than after harvest, the system prevents quality issues from propagating through subsequent purification steps. This preliminary action eliminates the need for multiple post-harvest purification and sorting steps, preserving cell yield and viability while ensuring product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12472496B2Platforms and systems for automated cell culture
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 CELLINO BIOTECH INC
  • US12472496B2 patent drawing
  • US12472496B2 patent drawing
  • US12472496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are platforms, systems, and methods including a cell culture system that includes a cell culture container comprising a cell culture, the cell culture receiving input cells, a cell imaging subsystem configured to acquire images of the cell culture, a computing subsystem configured to perform a cell culture process on the cell culture according to the images acquired by the cell imaging subsystem, and a cell editing subsystem configured to edit the cell culture to produce output cell products according to the cell culture process.