Cell Dissociation Device Using Controlled Shear Stress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical cell dissociation technologies for mammalian cell agglomerations often result in inconsistent cell quality due to manual handling and mechanical forces that negatively impact cell viability, making them unsuitable for cell therapy applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a recirculation loop with a shear component that applies a maximal shear of 2-500 Pa to dissociate mammalian cell agglomerations between 30 µm to 300 µm into single cells or oligomers of 8-30 µm, ensuring consistent cell quality and viability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual mechanical dissociation (pipetting up-and-down) is used, then cell aggregates can be dissociated, but cell quality becomes inconsistent due to differences between handlers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operationVSAvoidcell quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical pipetting with an automated recirculation system that uses controlled shear stress (2-500 Pa) to dissociate cell aggregates. This substitution eliminates human variability and provides consistent, reproducible dissociation results across different operators while maintaining ease of operation through automated pumping mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent defines specific shear stress parameters (2-500 Pa) and recirculation conditions to optimize dissociation. By controlling these physical parameters, the system achieves consistent cell quality regardless of operator skill level, transforming a skill-dependent manual process into a parameter-controlled automated process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If strong mechanical forces (sonication) are used for dissociation, then dissociation efficiency increases, but cell viability decreases due to negative impact of mechanical forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedissociation efficiencyVSAvoidcell viability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies and controls the shear stress parameter within a specific range (2-500 Pa) that is sufficient to dissociate cell aggregates effectively while remaining below the threshold that causes significant cell damage. This optimized parameter range achieves both high dissociation efficiency and maintained cell viability, resolving the contradiction between productivity and harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The recirculation system applies shear stress repeatedly over multiple passes rather than using a single intense mechanical force. This partial action approach gradually dissociates aggregates while allowing cells to recover between passes, achieving complete dissociation without the need for excessive mechanical force that would harm cell viability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If enzymatic dissociation is used, then cell aggregates can be dissociated, but enzymatic residues remain in the final cell therapy product

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedissociation capabilityVSAvoidenzymatic residues
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces enzymatic dissociation with a purely mechanical recirculation system that uses controlled shear stress to dissociate cell aggregates. This substitution eliminates the need for enzymes entirely, so no enzymatic residues remain in the final cell therapy product, while still achieving effective dissociation through the defined shear stress parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of substance

If mechanical dissociation is used for cell therapy applications, then enzymatic residues are avoided, but cell quality consistency becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzymatic residuesVSAvoidcell quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces uncontrolled manual mechanical dissociation with a controlled recirculation system that applies defined shear stress (2-500 Pa). This maintains the advantage of avoiding enzymatic residues while achieving consistent cell quality through parameter control and automation, resolving the contradiction between substance purity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method provides reliable dissociation with minimal cell damage, maintaining cell viability between 70-100% and low cell debris, making it suitable for cell therapy applications.

Implementation Method 1

bringing said mammalian cell agglomeration in the range of between greater than (>)30 μm to 300 μm into contact with a shear component (2) exerting a maximal shear in the range of between 2 Pa and 500 Pa thereby dissociating the mammalian cell agglomeration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentEP4461802A1Cell dissociation device and method
Publication Date: 2024.11.13 BAYER AG
  • EP4461802A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4461802A1 patent drawing
  • EP4461802A1 patent drawing

AI summary

What is described herein relates to a method and a device for dissociating cell agglomerations in the range of between >30 µm to 300 µm after harvest into single cells or cell oligomers in the range of 8-30 µm comprising the steps of • providing cell agglomerations in the range of between >30 µm to 300 µm • passing said cell agglomerations in the range of between >30 µm to 300 µm through a recirculation loop • bringing said cell agglomerations in the range of between >30 µm to 300 µm into contact with a shear component exerting a maximal shear in the range of between 2 Pa and 500 Pa thereby dissociating the cell agglomerations in the range of between >30 µm to 300 µm into single cells or cell oligomers in the range of 8-30 µm.