Cell Evaluation System for Objective Differentiation Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating cell differentiation in cell culture processes are subjective and reliant on human proficiency, making it difficult to accurately determine cell differentiation progress.

Innovation Solution

A cell evaluation method and system that acquire and calculate evaluation indices for comparative target cells, allowing for the evaluation of cell differentiation in evaluation target cells by comparing these indices, thereby providing an objective assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual evaluation methods are used to assess cell differentiation, then human expertise can be applied to interpret results, but the evaluation becomes subjective and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual evaluation with automated image processing and analysis systems. The system captures images of cells at different differentiation stages and uses computational algorithms to objectively measure and compare morphological features, eliminating human subjectivity while maintaining high measurement precision through standardized digital analysis protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces computational algorithms and image processing software as intermediaries between the cell samples and the evaluation process. These intermediaries objectively quantify cellular features such as area, perimeter, and shape parameters, providing consistent and reproducible measurements that bridge the gap between raw visual data and reliable evaluation results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple evaluation indices are calculated for different cell types, then comprehensive assessment is achieved, but the complexity of the evaluation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation applicabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal evaluation framework that can assess multiple cell types (hepatocytes, adipocytes, neurons, etc.) using the same basic image processing pipeline. The system calculates various evaluation indices including area, perimeter, circularity, and aspect ratio that are applicable across different cell types, allowing comprehensive assessment without requiring separate complex systems for each cell type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the evaluation process into distinct modular components: image acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, and result analysis. Each module handles specific tasks independently, making the overall system more manageable despite its versatility. This segmentation allows the system to compute multiple evaluation indices through a structured sequence of operations rather than a monolithic complex process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12293519B2Cell evaluation method, cell evaluation system and program
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 NIKON CORP
  • US12293519B2 patent drawing
  • US12293519B2 patent drawing
  • US12293519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cell evaluation method includes acquiring a first evaluation index and a first index calculated using the first evaluation index with respect to comparative target cells in a culture process including a cell differentiation-inducing process in which cell differentiation is induced, calculating a second index on the basis of the first evaluation index with respect to evaluation target cells different from the comparative target cells, and evaluating differentiation of the evaluation target cells by comparing the first index with the second index.