Cell Identification Model Using Filtered Microscopy Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying and measuring cells in microscopy images are time-consuming, prone to error, and ineffective in distinguishing between different cell types and debris, especially in images with low contrast or confluent cell populations, and are computationally intensive.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that uses training data to develop a model for classifying pixels associated with specific cell types by applying filters and machine learning techniques, enabling accurate identification and measurement of cells in microscopy images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual identification of cells is used, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering of the image to generate a pre-processed version that highlights potential cell locations and boundaries. This preliminary action reduces the search space for the machine learning model, enabling faster processing while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A machine learning model serves as an intermediary between the raw image data and the final cell identification results. The model is trained to recognize cell patterns and boundaries, automatically performing the identification task that would otherwise require manual intervention, thus improving productivity without sacrificing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If edge detection methods are used, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidcell boundary identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model acts as an intermediary that processes both the original image and edge detection results. It learns to distinguish true cell boundaries from false edges detected by traditional methods, improving boundary identification accuracy while maintaining the speed benefits of automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple processing approaches (edge detection, filtering, and machine learning classification) into a composite processing pipeline. Each method contributes its strengths: edge detection provides speed, filtering reduces noise, and the machine learning model ensures accurate cell boundary identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Measurement precision

If graph cuts are used to distinguish objects from background, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject segmentation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering and feature extraction to pre-process the image data before applying segmentation. This reduces the complexity of the segmentation task, enabling more efficient computation while maintaining the ability to accurately distinguish cells from background and debris.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model extracts and focuses on the most relevant features for cell identification, separating them from irrelevant image data. This extraction process simplifies the subsequent segmentation task, improving computational efficiency without sacrificing segmentation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If traditional filtering is applied to remove debris, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell vs debris discrimination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

A trained machine learning classifier serves as an intermediary that automatically distinguishes cells from debris based on learned patterns. This automated classification replaces time-consuming manual filtering while maintaining or improving discrimination accuracy through the model's ability to recognize subtle distinguishing features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3063289B1Method and system for classifying and identifying individual cells in a microscopy image
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 MOLECULAR DEVICES LLC
  • EP3063289B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3063289B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3063289B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

In a method and system for identifying objects in an image, an image and training data are received. The training data identifies a pixel associated with an object of a particular type in the image. A plurality of filtered versions of the image are developed. The training data and the plurality of filtered versions of the image are processed to develop a trained model for classifying pixels associated with objects of the particular type. The trained model is applied to the image to identify pixels associated a plurality of objects of the particular type in the image. Additional image processing steps are developed to further refine the identified pixels for better fitting of the contour of the objects with their edges.