Cell Muting for Handover Signaling in Cellular Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

State-of-the-art cellular networks face challenges in maintaining robust handover procedures, particularly in tight reuse environments where interference from neighboring cells disrupts service quality and reduces system capacity, making it difficult to achieve optimal handover timing and reduce interference during handover signaling.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves temporarily muting one or more dominant interfering cells during the handover signaling process to enhance the Carrier-to-Interference (C/I) ratio, thereby improving handover robustness and reducing interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If tight frequency reuse is employed to maximize spectral efficiency, then spectral efficiency is improved, but interference from neighboring cells increases disrupting service quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidinterference from neighboring cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of dominant interfering cells before handover signaling occurs. By pre-identifying which cells will cause interference during handover, the network can proactively mute these cells at the appropriate time, preventing interference before it disrupts the handover process while maintaining tight frequency reuse for spectral efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The muting configuration is dynamically adjusted based on real-time handover conditions. The network controller selectively mutes only the dominant interfering cells identified for each specific handover scenario, rather than applying static muting to all cells. This dynamic approach allows tight frequency reuse to be maintained for non-interfering cells while temporarily muting only those causing interference during handover

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If handover signaling is performed at cell borders, then handover capability is achieved, but radio conditions are poor making handover unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover capabilityVSAvoidhandover reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by muting dominant interfering cells before handover signaling takes place. This pre-emptive muting counteracts the poor radio conditions at cell borders by eliminating the dominant interference sources, thereby improving the reliability of handover signaling without compromising the ability to perform handovers at cell borders

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The network controller acts as an intermediary that coordinates between the serving cell, target cell, and dominant interfering cells. It sends muting commands to the interfering cells to temporarily reduce their transmission power or silence them during handover signaling, creating a more favorable radio environment for the handover process while maintaining normal operation for other users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If dominant interfering cells are muted during handover signaling, then handover robustness is improved, but network capacity may be reduced due to muted transmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover robustnessVSAvoidnetwork capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The muting operation is applied locally and selectively only to the specific dominant interfering cells that are causing problems for a particular handover, rather than applying blanket muting to all cells. This localized approach ensures that handover robustness is improved for the affected handover while minimizing the impact on overall network capacity, as other cells continue to operate normally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial muting by selectively silencing only the dominant interfering cells identified for each handover scenario, rather than muting all neighboring cells. This partial action is sufficient to improve handover robustness by eliminating the most problematic interference sources, while preserving network capacity by allowing non-interfering cells to continue their normal transmissions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7925264B2Method and arrangement for improved handover by muting interfering nodes
Publication Date: 2011.04.12 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US7925264B2 patent drawing
  • US7925264B2 patent drawing
  • US7925264B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a telecommunication system, a method for improved handover signaling includes temporarily enhancing the radio environment of a user engaged in handover signaling by muting one or more dominant interfering cells during the signaling process, and coordinating the muting with the actual handover signaling.