Cell Operational Priority Index for Network Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems lack efficient mechanisms for dynamically prioritizing and optimizing network operations based on cell priorities, leading to suboptimal maintenance activities and energy usage, especially in complex scenarios like natural calamities or high traffic conditions, without considering dynamic network characteristics.

Innovation Solution

Introduce a cell operational priority index (COPI) to automate cell prioritization, enabling network optimization functions like NOWOA and NAAP to optimize workflows, exclusion lists, and energy scheduling based on real-time or predicted cell priorities, using analytics for traffic and revenue data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dynamic cell prioritization is implemented, then network optimization efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork optimization efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments network optimization into distinct functional modules: priority value determination module, workflow sequence determination module, exclusion list determination module, and energy saving scheduling module. Each module handles specific optimization tasks independently, improving overall efficiency while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic cell prioritization by continuously determining priority values based on current network conditions, traffic patterns, and operational requirements. This dynamic approach enables the system to adapt to changing conditions and optimize performance in real-time without requiring complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If manual maintenance scheduling is used, then operational control is maintained, but maintenance downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance downtimeVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining optimal workflow sequences and identifying suitable maintenance windows in advance. The workflow sequence determination module analyzes network conditions and schedules maintenance activities during periods of lowest impact, thereby reducing actual maintenance downtime while maintaining operational control through planned automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the management system monitors network performance and maintenance outcomes, then adjusts future scheduling decisions accordingly. This feedback loop enables the automated system to learn from past operations and continuously improve its scheduling accuracy, reducing downtime while maintaining control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If energy saving scheduling is implemented, then energy consumption is reduced, but network availability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidnetwork availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by differentiating energy saving strategies across individual cells based on their priority levels and operational requirements. High-priority cells maintain full availability while low-priority cells are scheduled for energy saving modes, allowing the system to reduce overall energy consumption without compromising the availability of critical network segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The energy saving scheduling module dynamically adjusts network availability settings based on real-time priority values and traffic conditions. During low-traffic periods, the system can schedule energy saving modes for non-critical cells, while automatically restoring full availability when priority levels change or traffic patterns indicate increased demand, thus balancing energy efficiency with network reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250300887A1Method, apparatus and computer program
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20250300887A1 patent drawing
  • US20250300887A1 patent drawing
  • US20250300887A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided an apparatus comprising means for: receiving, from a management system, information indicating one or more priority values associated with a respective one or more cells; and performing one or more network optimization processes based on the received information indicating the one or more priority values associated with the respective one or more cells.