Automated Feature Selection for Cell Phenotype Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for classifying cell phenotypes are computationally intensive and inefficient, as they require analyzing hundreds of texture and morphology features, with no universally accepted method to select a manageable subset of relevant features for classification.

Innovation Solution

A method that identifies a small set of relevant features by determining signal-to-noise ratios for pairs of features, allowing for fast and efficient classification by selecting a subset of feature pairs with the highest signal-to-noise ratios, using an automated feature selection module and classification module.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If hundreds of texture and morphology features are calculated and used for classification, then classification accuracy can be maintained, but computation time and processing complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and selects only the most relevant features from the original set of hundreds of texture and morphology features. By identifying and removing redundant or less informative features, the system maintains classification accuracy while significantly reducing the computational burden and processing time required for analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the feature selection process by changing from considering all original features to selecting a optimized subset based on relevance and redundancy analysis. This parameter change in the number of features considered directly reduces computation time while preserving the essential information needed for accurate classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If all possible combinations of features are tested to identify relevant features, then feature selection accuracy improves, but the complexity and time required becomes impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature selection accuracyVSAvoidfeature selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential features by analyzing feature relevance and redundancy, then selects only the most informative subset. This extraction approach avoids the need to evaluate all possible feature combinations, thereby reducing selection complexity while maintaining accurate identification of relevant features for classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If a small subset of features is selected for classification, then processing speed improves, but the risk of omitting important features increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidclassification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the number of features to be used by analyzing feature importance and redundancy. By determining the optimal subset size and composition, the system achieves faster processing speed while maintaining classification reliability, as the selected features are specifically chosen to preserve the most informative content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of feature relevance and redundancy before the actual classification process. This preliminary action identifies and selects the most important features in advance, ensuring that the reduced feature set maintains classification reliability while enabling faster processing during the actual classification task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8942459B2Methods and apparatus for fast identification of relevant features for classification or regression
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 PERKINELMER CELLULAR TECH GERMANY GMBH
  • US8942459B2 patent drawing
  • US8942459B2 patent drawing
  • US8942459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In various embodiments, methods and apparatus are provided for automated selection of features of cells useful for classifying cell phenotype. The methods include determining a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) for each of a plurality of pairs of features, rather than S/N for individual features. The approach is capable of quickly identifying a small set of features of imaged cells that are most relevant for classification of a desired cell phenotype from among a very large number of features. The small group of relevant features can then be used to more efficiently and more accurately classify phenotype of unidentified cells.