Cell Placement Optimization Using Ray-Tracing Channel Matrices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The traditional method of manually testing signal quality for base station placement in mobile networks is costly and time-consuming, as it does not accurately reflect the electromagnetic environment of different fields of placement.

Innovation Solution

A method involving generating user distributions and ray-tracing channel matrices to calculate fitness values for candidate cell locations, optimizing cell placement through iterative processes using algorithms like particle swarm optimization and k-means clustering, and selecting locations based on coverage and system capacity thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual testing of signal quality for each location is used, then placement accuracy can be improved, but time cost and manpower cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal quality measurement accuracyVSAvoidtime cost and manpower cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual electromagnetic environment model that copies and simulates the real-world electromagnetic propagation characteristics. Instead of manually testing each physical location, the system generates ray-tracing channel matrices that replicate signal propagation behavior in a virtual space, allowing automated evaluation of candidate cell locations without physical deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual testing process with an automated computational electromagnetic simulation system. The ray-tracing algorithm automatically calculates channel matrices and evaluates signal quality metrics (coverage and system capacity) for multiple candidate locations simultaneously, substituting human-operated physical testing with computer-based virtual simulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated simulation with ray-tracing channel matrices is used, then time cost is reduced, but measurement precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation efficiencyVSAvoidelectromagnetic environment simulation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs ray-tracing technology with configurable electromagnetic parameters (frequency, propagation models, environmental characteristics) to adjust the simulation fidelity. By optimizing these parameters, the system achieves high measurement precision in the virtual electromagnetic environment while maintaining automated high-speed evaluation capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements an iterative optimization process where fitness values (coverage and system capacity) are calculated based on ray-tracing channel matrices, and candidate cell locations are refined through feedback loops. The system compares simulation results against performance thresholds and iteratively improves candidate locations, ensuring high precision in the automated evaluation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11012867B1Method of cell placement and related computer program product
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 NAT CHIAO TUNG UNIV
  • US11012867B1 patent drawing
  • US11012867B1 patent drawing
  • US11012867B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of cell placement includes choosing the ray-tracing channel matrices for the Nth iteration according to candidate cell locations of the Nth iteration and the user distributions, calculating fitness values for the Nth iteration based on the ray-tracing channel matrices, substituting the fitness values for the Nth iteration and corresponding candidate cell locations for the best fitness and best candidate cell locations in a total iterative process respectively if the fitness values for the Nth iteration are greater than or equal to multiple thresholds and the best fitness in a total iterative process, storing candidate cell locations of the Nth iteration, and verifies termination criteria, if termination criteria are not satisfied at the Nth iteration, generating the candidate cell locations of the N+1th iteration.