Automated Cell Processing Enclosure for Sterile Multi-Batch QC

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing stem cells for regenerative medicine are labor-intensive, inefficient, and expensive, limiting their widespread use due to the need for clean room operation, processing one cell line at a time, and lack of full automation for quality control tests.

Innovation Solution

An automated system for processing biological samples that maintains sterility without a clean room, allows multiple batches to be processed simultaneously, performs quality control tests, and integrates analytical capabilities, all without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current manual methods are used for stem cell processing, then quality control can be performed, but the process is labor-intensive and can only process one cell line at a time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs automated robotic modules that perform cell processing operations autonomously without human intervention. The robotic modules can autonomously navigate, manipulate cell culture vessels, perform media changes, and conduct quality control tests, enabling the system to serve itself and eliminating the need for manual labor in routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The processing system is divided into multiple independent robotic modules, each capable of performing specific functions such as media delivery, cell manipulation, and quality control. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple cell lines simultaneously, as each module can operate independently on different samples at the same time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If manual processing methods are used, then flexibility in handling different cell lines is maintained, but cross-contamination risk increases and sterility cannot be ensured without clean room operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesterility maintenanceVSAvoidclean room requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes sealed flexible membranes and barriers that create sterile boundaries between different cell processing areas. These flexible seals allow the robotic modules to access and manipulate cell culture vessels while maintaining sterility, eliminating the need for clean room environments. The membranes can be easily replaced and sterilized between runs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic modules act as intermediaries between the external environment and the sterile cell processing environment. The robots perform all operations within the sterile chamber without human hands entering, thereby preventing contamination. The robotic arms are equipped with sterilizable tools and operate in a controlled atmosphere that maintains sterility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated systems are introduced to increase productivity, then processing speed improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic modules are designed with multi-functionality, capable of performing multiple operations including media delivery, cell manipulation, quality control testing, and vessel handling. This universality reduces the overall system complexity compared to having separate specialized machines for each function, while still enabling high-throughput parallel processing of multiple cell lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If quality control tests are performed manually, then detailed analysis can be conducted, but the process becomes more time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control accuracyVSAvoidquality control duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Manual quality control operations are replaced with automated robotic systems that perform sampling, testing, and analysis. The robotic modules can conduct multiple quality control tests in parallel using automated liquid handling and detection systems, maintaining measurement precision while dramatically reducing the time required compared to manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260079172A1Automated cell processing systems and methods
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 GENESIS TECH LTD
  • US20260079172A1 patent drawing
  • US20260079172A1 patent drawing
  • US20260079172A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for automated processing of a plurality of batches, each batch being derived from one biological sample, the system comprising an enclosure which can be closed and sterilized, each batch of the plurality of batches comprising one or more cell processing container; a plurality of reagent containers for holding reagents within the enclosure; at least one reagent dispenser within the enclosure for dispensing reagents during said automated processing; a quality control system within the enclosure for analyzing at least one characteristic of a batch during said automated processing; a harvester within the enclosure for harvesting batches; a robotic system within the enclosure, configured for transporting cell processing containers, decapping or otherwise opening cell processing containers, pipetting reagents or liquids from cell processing containers, and aspirating liquids from cell processing containers, during said automated processing; a tracker for electronically tracking the plurality of batches after its introduction to the enclosure; and a control unit (CU) communicatively coupled to the at least one reagent dispenser, the quality control system, the harvester, the robotic system and the tracker for controlling said automatic processing of said batches.