Cell Sorting Using AI Embeddings for Multi-Marker Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cell sorting techniques based on nonlinear embeddings are subjective and inexact, particularly when dealing with relations between three or more cell markers, as they rely on two-dimensional gate sequences that are difficult to apply effectively.

Innovation Solution

The use of a machine learning model, such as a neural network, to learn a parametric representation of cell sorter data, allowing for real-time embedding and sorting based on embedding coordinates, which transforms high-dimensional data into lower-dimensional representations for precise cell sorting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional two-dimensional gate sequences are used for cell sorting, then the sorting process is simple to implement, but the sorting precision and accuracy deteriorate when dealing with relations between three or more cell markers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting precisionVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional gate sequences to high-dimensional parametric embeddings by learning coordinate transformations that map cell marker data into embedding spaces. This dimensional expansion enables simultaneous consideration of multiple cell markers (three or more) in a unified coordinate system, resolving the limitation of conventional 2D approaches while maintaining computational tractability through learned transformation functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter representation from discrete gate boundaries in 2D space to continuous embedding coordinates in high-dimensional space. By learning parametric representations that map cell data to embedding coordinates, the system achieves more precise sorting decisions that can incorporate relationships among multiple markers simultaneously, improving sorting precision without requiring exponentially more gates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If high-dimensional cell sorter data is processed using traditional methods, then the computational load is low, but the sorting accuracy and ability to handle multiple markers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting accuracyVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary learning of embedding coordinate transformations during an offline training phase using representative cell data. This pre-computed parametric representation is then applied during actual sorting operations, allowing high-dimensional data to be processed efficiently through the learned transformation rather than requiring computationally intensive real-time analysis of all marker combinations. The preliminary learning captures complex relationships that can be rapidly applied during sorting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a learned parametric model that copies the essential structure and relationships of high-dimensional cell marker data into a compressed embedding space. This parametric representation serves as a simplified copy that retains the critical information needed for accurate sorting while requiring significantly less computational resources to process during actual sorting operations compared to analyzing raw high-dimensional data directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If subjective gate sequences are used for cell sorting, then the method is easy to implement, but the reliability and exactness of sorting deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting reliabilityVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated learning of embedding coordinate transformations from training data. The system automatically learns the optimal parametric representation and coordinate mappings without requiring subjective human intervention to define gate sequences. This automated learning process produces consistent, objective sorting decisions that improve reliability while the learned models can be applied systematically across different datasets and sorting tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention incorporates feedback mechanisms during the learning phase, where the parametric model is trained on labeled cell data with known sorting outcomes. The learning algorithm adjusts the embedding coordinate transformations to minimize errors between predicted and actual sorting decisions. This feedback-driven training ensures the learned parametric representation accurately reflects the relationships needed for reliable sorting, making the method more objective and dependable than subjective gate sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250003859A1Systems and Methods of Cell Sorting Implementing Artificial Intelligence
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US20250003859A1 patent drawing
  • US20250003859A1 patent drawing
  • US20250003859A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are apparatuses, systems, as well as related methods, computing devices, and computer-readable media related to real time cell sorter cell sorting using embeddings. For example, in some embodiments a method may comprise receiving first cell sorter data. The first cell sorter data may include cell sorter data including microscopy data, hyperspectral imaging data, high-dimensional vector data, or one or more combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the cell sorter data may include quantitative fluorescence data expressed as one or more of antibodies bound per cell, antibody binding capacity (ABC), molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF), one or more other quantitative indicators of fluorescence, or one or more combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the quantitative fluorescence data includes one or more fluorescence signals from: one or more fluorescent proteins, one or more fluorescent dyes, one or more fluorescently conjugate antibodies, or one or more combinations thereof.