Cell-Specific CRE Prediction Using MPRA-Trained Neural Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to accurately quantify the gene-regulatory potential of DNA sequences at nucleotide resolution, particularly in a cell or tissue-specific manner, due to the intractability of testing every element in the human genome using Massively Parallel Reporter Assays (MPRAs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a machine learning network trained on MPRA data sets to predict the activity of cis-regulatory elements (CREs) with cell-type, cell state, or environment specificity, employing neural networks to process nucleic acid sequences and generate predictions of CRE activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If Massively Parallel Reporter Assays (MPRAs) are used to directly characterize cis-regulatory function, then measurement precision of CRE activity is improved, but device complexity and productivity deteriorate due to the intractability of testing every element in the human genome

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCRE activity measurement precisionVSAvoidgenome-wide CRE testing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates computational copies of MPRA functionality through machine learning models. Instead of physically testing every genomic element via MPRA, the system trains ML models on a subset of experimentally characterized sequences, then uses these models to predict CRE activity across the entire genome. This computational copying approach maintains measurement precision while achieving genome-wide coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary MPRA experiments on a representative subset of genomic sequences to generate training data before scaling to genome-wide analysis. By pre-characterizing a curated set of CREs and using this data to train predictive models, the system establishes a foundation that enables subsequent high-throughput prediction without requiring exhaustive experimental testing of every genomic element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If computational methods are used to predict CRE activity, then productivity is improved by enabling genome-wide analysis, but measurement precision deteriorates compared to direct MPRA measurement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenome-wide CRE analysis throughputVSAvoidCRE activity prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates computational copies of MPRA functionality through machine learning models. Instead of physically testing every genomic element via MPRA, the system trains ML models on a subset of experimentally characterized sequences, then uses these models to predict CRE activity across the entire genome. This computational copying approach maintains measurement precision while achieving genome-wide coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical MPRA experimental system with a computational machine learning system. The ML models substitute for the physical assay machinery, using learned patterns from training data to predict CRE activity. This substitution enables genome-wide analysis while maintaining accuracy by capturing the underlying biological relationships in computational form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If cell-type specific CREs are designed to enhance gene expression in targeted cells, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for cell-specific optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell-type specificity of CRE activityVSAvoidCRE design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing CREs with sequence features specifically optimized for target cell types. The system identifies and incorporates cell-type-specific regulatory motifs and sequence characteristics that enable selective activity in desired cell populations. This localized optimization of sequence properties achieves cell-type specificity without requiring entirely different CRE designs for each cell type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes sequence parameters of CREs to achieve cell-type specificity. By adjusting nucleotide composition, motif density, and sequence features based on cell-type-specific patterns learned from training data, the system generates CREs with tailored activity profiles. These parameter modifications enable precise control of gene expression in target cells while maintaining a unified design framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260055408A1Cell-specific CIS-regulatory elements, uses thereof, and methods of generating the same
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 THE BROAD INST INC
  • US20260055408A1 patent drawing
  • US20260055408A1 patent drawing
  • US20260055408A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described in certain embodiments herein are computer implemented methods, systems, and computer program products that can be used to identify or engineered cell specific cis-regulatory elements (CREs). Also described herein are cell specific CREs and uses thereof.