Battery Cell Stack End Caps for Draft-Angle Compression Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traction battery packs face challenges in securely interfacing cell stacks with enclosure structures, particularly due to draft angles in the side walls, which can lead to inadequate compression and structural integrity.

Innovation Solution

The use of end caps that square draft angles and apply compressive loads, combined with foam structures and adhesives, to enhance the interface between cell stacks and enclosure walls, thereby improving structural integrity and accommodating battery expansion forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the side wall includes a draft angle for ease of manufacturing, then the enclosure assembly is easier to manufacture, but the compression interface between the end cap and cell stack becomes inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenclosure assembly manufacturingVSAvoidcompression interface strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap is divided into two distinct sections: a first side section with a substantially flat surface that interfaces with the cell stack, and a second side section with a sloped surface that interfaces with the draft angle side wall. This segmentation allows each section to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The end cap acts as an intermediary component between the draft angle side wall and the cell stack. It translates the sloped draft angle interface into a flat compression surface, mediating between the manufacturing requirements of the enclosure and the structural requirements of the battery cell support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If the end cap is designed to square the draft angle for structural integrity, then the compression interface is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression interface strengthVSAvoidend cap geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap merges multiple functions into a single component: it provides structural support, squares the draft angle, applies compression to the cell stack, and interfaces with both the enclosure wall and battery cells. This consolidation reduces overall device complexity despite the increased geometric complexity of the end cap itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The end cap serves multiple purposes simultaneously: it acts as a structural beam support, a compression applicator, a draft angle translator, and an interface between different components. This multi-functionality justifies the increased geometric complexity by eliminating the need for separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Strength

If foam structure is added between the end cap and side wall for compression, then the structural integrity is enhanced, but the device complexity and manufacturing steps increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidassembly components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The foam structure is pre-positioned between the end cap and the side wall before final assembly. This beforehand cushioning ensures that compression forces are distributed evenly and that the foam is properly compressed to the correct density, enhancing structural integrity while simplifying the assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The foam structure acts as a flexible compression element that can conform to slight variations in the interface between the end cap and side wall. This flexibility allows for effective compression without requiring extremely precise manufacturing tolerances, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Data Source

PatentUS20240079694A1Cell stack end caps for use within traction battery packs
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US20240079694A1 patent drawing
  • US20240079694A1 patent drawing
  • US20240079694A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Cell stack end caps are provided for use within traction battery packs. An end cap may be positioned to at least partially fill a volume of space between a cell stack and an enclosure structure (e.g., an enclosure tray) inside the traction battery pack. The end cap may be configured to square a draft angle of a side wall of the enclosure structure in order to impart a compressive load to the cell stack and/or the enclosure structure. A foam structure may be positioned between the end cap and the enclosure structure or within a hollow passageway of the end cap for increasing the structural integrity of the traction battery pack.