Cell Subset Deconvolution Using SVR for Noisy Tissue Mixtures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for studying cell heterogeneity, such as immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, rely on limited phenotypic markers and can lead to altered results due to tissue disaggregation, and computational methods struggle with mixtures of unknown content and noise, particularly in solid tumors, and fail to discriminate closely related cell types effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method involving optimizing a regression between a feature profile of a sample and a reference matrix of feature signatures using support vector regression (SVR) to minimize a linear loss function and L2-norm penalty, allowing for accurate estimation of fractional representations of distinct components in the sample.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If computational methods are used to predict cell type fractions in mixtures with unknown content and noise, then the method can handle complex biological samples, but the accuracy deteriorates compared to well-defined mixtures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle mixtures with unknown content and noiseVSAvoidaccuracy of cell type fraction prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary actions by obtaining purified cell samples and measuring their feature profiles to create a reference matrix before analyzing complex mixtures. This reference matrix is then used to deconvolute and predict cell type fractions in unknown mixtures, enabling accurate analysis despite the complexity and noise in the sample.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If computational methods are used to discriminate closely related cell types, then the method can identify cell subsets, but the accuracy deteriorates for closely related cell types with similar features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to identify cell subsetsVSAvoidaccuracy of cell type discrimination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method segments the analysis by creating separate feature profiles for different cell types through purification and measurement. These segmented reference profiles are then used to deconvolute mixed samples, enabling the method to distinguish between closely related cell types by comparing their unique feature signatures in the reference matrix.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If tissue disaggregation is performed prior to flow cytometry, then the method can analyze cell suspensions, but cell loss and damage occur altering results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to perform flow cytometry analysisVSAvoidaccuracy of cell composition results
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of physically disaggregating tissue for flow cytometry, the method creates a computational copy (reference matrix) of cell type feature profiles from purified samples. This reference matrix is then used to deconvolute and identify cell types in intact tissue sections, eliminating the need for physical disaggregation and avoiding cell loss and damage while maintaining analysis accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Device complexity

If limited phenotypic markers are used in immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, then the method can be simplified, but the ability to study cell heterogeneity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of staining protocolVSAvoidresolution of cell heterogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method transitions from using limited phenotypic markers in traditional staining to measuring multiple features (genes, proteins, metabolites) simultaneously through transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. This dimensional expansion allows the method to capture comprehensive cell heterogeneity without increasing staining complexity, as the multi-omics data are integrated through computational deconvolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12584180B2Methods and systems for determining proportions of distinct cell subsets
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US12584180B2 patent drawing
  • US12584180B2 patent drawing
  • US12584180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of deconvolving a feature profile of a physical system are provided herein. The present method may include: optimizing a regression between a) a feature profile of a first plurality of distinct components and b) a reference matrix of feature signatures for a second plurality of distinct components, wherein the feature profile is modeled as a linear combination of the reference matrix, and wherein the optimizing includes solving a set of regression coefficients of the regression, wherein the solution minimizes 1) a linear loss function and 2) an L2-norm penalty function; and estimating the fractional representation of one or more distinct components among the second plurality of distinct components present in the sample based on the set of regression coefficients. Systems and computer readable media for performing the subject methods are also provided.