Automated Cell Processing Workcell With Robotic Cartridge Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cell product manufacturing processes are cumbersome, expensive, and prone to human error, lacking end-to-end process flexibility, robustness, and scalability, and often require costly cleanroom facilities.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for processing cell products using a cartridge that moves between instruments within an automated workcell, incorporating modules for various cell processing operations, including bioreactor, selection, and sorting, with a robot and processor control, enabling automated, flexible, and scalable manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual operations are used in biosafety cabinets and clean rooms, then sterility can be maintained, but labor costs and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesterilityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-contained cartridges with integrated sterile barriers that maintain sterility automatically without requiring manual sterile techniques. The closed system design allows the cartridge to service itself regarding sterility maintenance throughout the processing workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations performed by technicians in biosafety cabinets are replaced by an automated robotic system that manipulates cartridges through standardized interfaces, eliminating the need for manual sterile handling while maintaining sterility through the closed system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If automated systems are implemented, then labor costs and operator error risk decrease, but initial system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor requirementsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is segmented into modular components: standardized cartridges containing processing modules, a robotic manipulation system, and a control system. This segmentation allows the complexity to be distributed and managed through standardized interfaces rather than requiring a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system uses universal standardized interfaces and cartridge designs that can perform multiple cell processing operations through different cartridge configurations, reducing the need for specialized equipment for each operation and thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If pre-configured instrumentation and tubing sets are used, then setup time is reduced, but operational flexibility and adaptability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup timeVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static pre-configured tubing sets to dynamic reconfigurable cartridge assemblies. Cartridges can be selectively assembled with different modules and configurations based on the specific processing requirements, allowing the system to adapt dynamically to different operations while maintaining quick setup through standardized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changes in operational parameters by swapping cartridges with different configurations rather than reconfiguring fixed instrumentation. This enables flexible adaptation to different processing needs while maintaining consistent standardized interfaces and setup procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If closed system automation is implemented, then contamination risk is reduced, but process failure risk from accidental operator error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination riskVSAvoidprocess failure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor cartridge handling, connection status, and processing parameters. This feedback allows the system to detect and correct potential errors automatically, preventing process failures while maintaining the closed system's contamination protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates error prevention features built into the cartridge design and robotic handling, such as fail-safe connection mechanisms and validated processing protocols, that cushion against potential operator errors before they can cause process failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances sterility, reduces costs, minimizes labor and contamination risks, improves process reliability and throughput, and allows for faster, more flexible cell product manufacturing with reduced risk of loss.

Implementation Method 1

The cartridge may comprise a magnetic-activated cell selection module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The sorting module may comprise a fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Implementation Method 3

The cartridge may comprise an electroporation module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroporation: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Implementation Method 4

The cartridge may comprise a counterflow centrifugal elutriation (CCE) module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250367660A1Apparatus and method for control of cell processing system
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 CELLARES CORP
  • US20250367660A1 patent drawing
  • US20250367660A1 patent drawing
  • US20250367660A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are cell processing systems, devices, and methods thereof. A system for cell processing may comprise a plurality of instruments each independently configured to perform one or more cell processing operations upon a cartridge, and a robot capable of moving the cartridge between each of the plurality of instruments.