Cellular Radio Emission Control via Priority-Based Power Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cellular communication systems, existing technologies face challenges in efficiently managing radio frequency emissions across cells with overlapping coverage areas, leading to regulatory limits on maximum radiation levels, which can impact service performance and compliance.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that determine a set of cells with overlapping coverage, prioritize cells based on radio access technology quality, and allocate a maximum radiation level to each cell, allowing a smaller power reduction for higher-priority cells, thereby optimizing transmission power while adhering to regulatory limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radio emissions are increased to improve service performance in overlapping cells, then wireless service quality is improved, but regulatory radiation limits are exceeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewireless service qualityVSAvoidradiation limit compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating radiation allocation across different cells based on their priority levels and service requirements. High-priority cells (e.g., providing critical services) receive higher radiation allocations while low-priority cells receive reduced allocations, allowing each cell to have customized radiation characteristics suited to its specific function rather than uniform limitation across all cells

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of maximum radiation level from a fixed regulatory limit to a dynamically allocated value based on cell priority, current radiation levels, and service requirements. This allows the system to adjust radiation parameters within regulatory constraints to optimize service quality while maintaining compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If uniform radiation limits are applied to all cells, then regulatory compliance is ensured, but service performance in high-priority cells deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation limit complianceVSAvoidservice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different radiation allocation strategies to different cells based on their priority classification. High-priority cells maintain radiation levels closer to maximum limits to ensure service quality, while low-priority cells operate at reduced levels, creating localized optimization throughout the network while maintaining overall regulatory compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If power reduction is applied to meet radiation limits, then regulatory compliance is achieved, but transmission quality and service performance decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation limit complianceVSAvoidtransmission quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach to power reduction from uniform application to selective application based on cell priority. Instead of reducing power across all cells, the system identifies high-priority cells and maintains their power levels closer to maximum, while applying power reduction primarily to low-priority cells, thereby minimizing the impact on transmission quality while achieving compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple radio access technologies operate in overlapping cells, then network capacity and versatility are improved, but radiation management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidradiation management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a unified radiation management framework that handles multiple radio access technologies (LTE, 5G, etc.) and different cell types (macro, micro, pico cells) through a single priority-based allocation mechanism. This universal approach simplifies management despite the diversity of technologies by treating them all through the same regulatory compliance lens while allowing technology-specific optimizations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12075368B2Controlling radio frequency emissions in cellular system
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • US12075368B2 patent drawing
  • US12075368B2 patent drawing
  • US12075368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document discloses a solution for controlling radio emissions in cells of a cellular communication system. According to an aspect, a method includes determining a set of cells having a spatially overlapping coverage area in a sector, wherein the set of cells includes at least a first cell and a second cell; determining a maximum total radiation level for the sector; determining a priority of each cell in the set of cells such that the first cell is prioritized over the second cell; and allocating, on the basis of the maximum total radiation level and said priorities, to each cell in the set of cells a parameter indicating a maximum radiation level in the respective cell, wherein said allocating is performed such that a smaller power reduction from a maximum transmission power is allowed for the first cell than for the second cell.