Cellulose Depolymerization via Hydroxyl Radical Oxidation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing ethanol from cellulose or starch are inefficient and costly due to the difficulty in depolymerizing cellulose, which is locked in a rigid cell wall structure with lignin, and the crystallinity of cellulose making it hard to convert into glucose for fermentation.

Innovation Solution

Depolymerizing polysaccharides like cellulose or starch using hydroxyl free radicals formed by the interaction of an oxidant with a catalyst comprising a ligand complexed with a metal ion, such as iron methylglycine diacetate or iron-2,3,4,5,6 pentahydroxyhexanoate, to reduce molecular weight and facilitate enzymatic hydrolysis into sugars for ethanol production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If harsh thermochemical pretreatments are used to solubilize hemicellulose and cellulose, then solubilization is improved, but chemical by-products are generated that inhibit enzyme hydrolysis and decrease productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolubilization of hemicellulose and celluloseVSAvoidproductivity of fermentative microbes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using controlled oxidation conditions with specific oxidants (potassium permanganate, sodium persulfate, hydrogen peroxide) and metal catalysts (ferrous sulfate, ferric nitrate) to modify cellulose structure. This chemical parameter change enables solubilization without the harsh thermochemical conditions that produce inhibitory by-products, thus maintaining microbial productivity while improving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If mechanical grinding is used to process cellulosic materials, then processing is improved, but energy consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing of cellulosic materialsVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical grinding with a chemical oxidation system. Metal catalysts (ferrous or ferric salts) facilitate oxidation reactions that break down cellulose structure and solubilize it. This substitution eliminates the need for energy-intensive mechanical grinding while achieving the same processing goal, thus improving ease of manufacture and reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If aqueous solutions of enzymes are used to convert cellulose to glucose, then conversion is improved, but crystallinity of cellulose makes the process difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion of cellulose to glucoseVSAvoidaccessibility of enzymes to cellulose
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing oxidation treatment before enzymatic hydrolysis. The oxidation step with metal catalysts and oxidants pre-treats the cellulose structure, reducing crystallinity and increasing accessibility. This preliminary chemical modification enables subsequent enzymatic conversion to proceed more efficiently, thus improving both productivity and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If corn starch is used for ethanol production, then ethanol production is improved, but food prices increase due to diversion from food uses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethanol productionVSAvoidfood price increases
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the feedstock parameter from corn starch to cellulosic materials (agricultural residues, wood, grasses). This parameter change allows ethanol production to proceed using non-food biomass sources, maintaining high ethanol productivity while eliminating the harmful effect of food price increases caused by corn diversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method is seven times more energy efficient and 10% less expensive than corn starch ethanol production, eliminating the need for mechanical grinding and enhancing the efficiency of glucose and ethanol production from alternative biomass sources.

Implementation Method 1

hydroxyl radicals react with cellulose by cleaving bonds between glucose units in the polymer chain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidative degradation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

polysaccharides are reacted with hydroxyl free radicals to produce polysaccharides having lower molecular weights

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFree radical reaction:

Implementation Method 3

catalyst comprising a ligand complexed with a metal ion, such as iron methylglycine diacetate or iron-2,3,4,5,6 pentahydroxyhexanoate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

hydroxyl free radicals are formed by interaction of an oxidant with a catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reaction: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS8314231B2Systems, compositions, and/or methods for depolymerizing cellulose and/or starch
Publication Date: 2012.11.20 BIOSYST CONSULTING INC
  • US8314231B2 patent drawing
  • US8314231B2 patent drawing
  • US8314231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for depolymerizing polysaccharides are disclosed. In certain exemplary methods, polysaccharides having a first average molecular weight can be reacted with hydroxyl free radicals to produce polysaccharides having a second average molecular weight lower than the first average molecular weight. The hydroxyl free radicals can be formed by interaction of an oxidant with a catalyst comprising a polydentate ligand complexed with a metal ion. In certain exemplary embodiments, the oxidant can be hydrogen peroxide, and the catalyst can be iron methylglycine diacetate or iron-2,3,4,5,6 pentahydroxyhexanoate.