Collection Enhanced Materials for FCC Unit Emission Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for reducing SOx emissions in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units increase PM emissions and operational costs, and rely on expensive ammonia injection or increased ESP power, which are not environmentally sustainable in the long term.

Innovation Solution

The development of collection enhanced materials (CEM) and down stream additives (DSA) that include low electrical resistivity components and magnetic susceptibility increasing components, which are introduced into the gaseous exhaust stream to enhance PM collection and reduce emissions by improving the efficiency of particle removal devices like ESPs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If ammonia injection or increased ESP power is used to reduce SOx emissions, then SOx emissions are reduced, but PM emissions and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSOx emissionsVSAvoidPM emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrical resistivity parameter of the catalyst particles by introducing conductive materials (carbon black, metal oxides, graphite) to reduce PM escape. This parameter change allows the ESP to operate more efficiently at lower power levels while maintaining PM collection effectiveness, thereby resolving the contradiction between SOx reduction and PM emission control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite catalyst particles by combining traditional cracking catalyst materials with conductive materials (carbon black, metal oxides, or graphite). This composite structure provides both the catalytic function for SOx reduction and the electrical conductivity needed for effective PM collection in the ESP, eliminating the need for ammonia injection or excessive power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-generated harmful factors

If ammonia injection or increased ESP power is used to reduce SOx emissions, then SOx emissions are reduced, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSOx emissionsVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrical resistivity parameter of the catalyst particles by introducing conductive materials (carbon black, metal oxides, graphite) to reduce PM escape. This parameter change allows the ESP to operate more efficiently at lower power levels while maintaining PM collection effectiveness, thereby resolving the contradiction between SOx reduction and PM emission control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inexpensive conductive materials (carbon black, metal oxides, graphite) that can be easily incorporated into the catalyst formulation. These materials are cost-effective alternatives to expensive ammonia injection systems and reduce the operational costs associated with high-power ESP operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These materials effectively reduce PM escape into the atmosphere while maintaining or reducing SOx emissions, thereby meeting EPA regulations without increasing operational costs or environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

collection enhanced materials (CEM) and down stream additives (DSA) that include low electrical resistivity components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistivity reduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

magnetic susceptibility increasing components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic susceptibility enhancement: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

electrostatic precipitators (ESP)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic separation: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 4

electrostatic precipitators (ESP)...absorbing PM

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deposition: Electrostatic Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS8728400B2Cracking catalysts, additives, methods of making them and using them
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 JOHNSON MATTHEY PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US8728400B2 patent drawing
  • US8728400B2 patent drawing
  • US8728400B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Collection enhanced materials, flue gas additives, and methods of making the enhanced materials and flue gas additives are provided. In one embodiment, a down stream addition system configured to control material passing through a metering device from a vessel to a gaseous exhaust path extending between a unit and an exhaust flue of the unit is provided. In alternative embodiments, methods are provided for introducing at least one of a flue gas additive and a collection enhanced material to a gaseous exhaust stream exiting a unit; exposing and removing at least a portion of at least one a of flue gas additive and a collection enhanced material from a gaseous exhaust stream exiting a unit prior to entering an exhaust flue; and recycling at least a portion of material removed a from a gaseous exhaust stream exiting a unit back to the gaseous exhaust stream without passing through the unit.