Cement Catalyst for Plastic Depolymerization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing plastic recycling methods, particularly chemical recycling, face challenges with catalyst degradation due to poisoning substances produced during the depolymerization of plastic waste, leading to inefficient conversion of plastics into valuable hydrocarbon products.

Innovation Solution

A catalytic process using a cement-based catalyst with an Al2O3/Fe2O3 mass ratio equal to or higher than 5.0 is employed to depolymerize plastic waste, which is mixed with the feedstock and heated to 280° C. to 600° C. in an oxygen-free environment, ensuring efficient conversion of plastics into liquid and gaseous hydrocarbon products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional catalysts (FCC, zeolites, silica-alumina) are used for depolymerization, then depolymerization activity is achieved, but catalyst degradation occurs due to poisoning substances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst stabilityVSAvoidcatalyst poisoning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the catalyst by using cement with specific Al2O3/Fe2O3 mass ratio (≥5.0) and controlled content of harmful substances (CaO ≤10%, SO3 ≤3%, MgO ≤5%). This parameter optimization makes the catalyst resistant to poisoning by substances generated during plastic depolymerization, thereby improving reliability while maintaining depolymerization activity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses cement as a composite material that combines multiple oxides (Al2O3, Fe2O3, SiO2, CaO, MgO, SO3) in specific proportions. This composite structure creates a catalyst that is inherently more resistant to poisoning substances compared to traditional single-material catalysts like zeolites or silica-alumina, resolving the contradiction between maintaining activity and avoiding degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If thermal depolymerization is performed without catalyst, then process simplicity is maintained, but conversion efficiency and temperature requirements are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepolymerization conversion rateVSAvoiddepolymerization temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst changes the reaction parameters by enabling depolymerization at lower temperatures (280-600°C) while achieving high conversion rates (≥80%). The catalyst provides alternative reaction pathways with lower activation energy, simultaneously improving productivity and reducing temperature requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If high catalyst loading is used to improve conversion, then depolymerization efficiency increases, but process cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplastic conversion rateVSAvoidcatalyst quantity and management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimized catalyst composition enables high depolymerization activity at low loading levels (0.1-5 wt%). The enhanced catalytic efficiency per unit mass of catalyst allows achieving ≥80% conversion with minimal catalyst quantity, thereby improving productivity without increasing process complexity or cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves high conversion rates of at least 80% of plastic waste into liquid or gaseous products, with minimal solid residue, and produces a depolymerization oil with low C28+ fractions and low Branch Index, indicating high purity and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

heating the reactant mixture to a temperature ranging from 280° C. to 600° C., thereby obtaining a depolymerization product; wherein the catalyst is a cement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

heating the plastics to a temperature at which the polymers break down into fragments; this process is referred to as depolymerization and converts the plastic waste material to liquid fuel by thermal degradation (cracking) in the absence of oxygen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal degradation: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS20250206906A1Thermocatalytic plastic depolymerization process
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 BASELL POLIOLEFINE ITALIA SRL
  • US20250206906A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for depolymerizing plastic waste with a catalyst made from or containing a cement, having an Al2O3/Fe2O3 mass ratio equal to or higher than 5.0. A process for depolymerizing plastics, comprising the steps of: a) providing a plastic waste feedstock; b) mixing the plastic waste feedstock with a catalyst, thereby obtaining a reactant mixture; and c) heating the reactant mixture to a temperature ranging from 280° C. to 600° C., thereby obtaining a depolymerization product, wherein the catalyst is a cement, having an Al2O3/Fe2O3 mass ratio equal to or higher than 5.0.