Magnetic Separation of Cementitious Fraction from Concrete Waste

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for separating cement from concrete waste are inefficient, leading to high contamination and energy consumption, and fail to effectively recover the cementitious matrix for reuse in structural applications, which is essential for reducing CO2 emissions and improving recycling efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A process involving high-intensity magnetic separation to purify the cementitious fraction from hardened concrete waste, utilizing the paramagnetic characteristics of cement to differentiate it from other constituents, combined with mechanical and thermal treatments to optimize fragmentation and separation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional mechanical and thermal separation methods are used to separate cement from concrete waste, then separation can be achieved, but the separation efficiency is low and contamination levels are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of separation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical separation methods with high-intensity magnetic separation. The magnetic separator uses magnetic fields to separate paramagnetic cement particles from diamagnetic aggregate particles, achieving superior separation efficiency (95-98% cement recovery) without the complexity of multiple mechanical processing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the separation parameter from mechanical force to magnetic field intensity. By applying high-intensity magnetic fields (typically 1.5-3.0 Tesla), the system exploits the paramagnetic properties of cement to achieve efficient separation, transforming the separation mechanism from mechanical to magnetic-based.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If conventional separation methods are used, then processing can be performed, but energy consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycling rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces energy-intensive mechanical crushing and thermal processing with magnetic separation. The magnetic separator consumes significantly less energy while achieving higher recycling rates, as magnetic separation occurs without the need for extensive mechanical force or heat input required by conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of substance

If conventional separation methods are used, then cement can be recovered, but CO2 emissions remain high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecement recoveryVSAvoidCO2 emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional thermal and mechanical processing that generates high CO2 emissions with magnetic separation. This substitution significantly reduces the carbon footprint of cement recovery while maintaining high recovery rates, as magnetic separation requires minimal energy input compared to thermal processing and extensive mechanical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If high-intensity magnetic separation is applied, then separation efficiency increases and contamination reduces, but the complexity of the separation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification level of cementVSAvoidcomplexity of magnetic separation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex multi-stage mechanical separation systems with a single high-intensity magnetic separation unit. Although the magnetic separator itself is technologically advanced, it consolidates multiple separation functions into one device, achieving high purification levels (95-98% cement recovery with minimal aggregate contamination) without the operational complexity of sequential mechanical processing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Achieves high-efficiency separation of cement with reduced energy consumption and contamination, enabling the production of recycled cement with strengths comparable to traditional hydraulic binders while significantly lowering CO2 emissions.

Implementation Method 1

The separation process is based on the paramagnetic characteristics of the cementitious matrix that differentiate it from the other constituents of the concrete

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParamagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

purification of the cementitious matrix, using the technique of high intensity magnetic separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic separation: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS20230081205A1Process for separating the components of hardened concrete waste for producing recycled cement
Publication Date: 2023.03.16 INST POLITECNICO DE SETUBAL
  • US20230081205A1 patent drawing
  • US20230081205A1 patent drawing
  • US20230081205A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention lies within the field of construction materials and concerns a process for separating the constituents of hardened concrete, with the aim of extracting the cementitious fraction to be used in the production of thermoactivated recycled cement, involving the essential steps of: (a) crushing the concrete waste; (b) screening the crushed material to separate material smaller than about 1 mm; (c) fragmenting material larger than 1 mm; (d) screening material smaller than 1 mm into various granulometric fractions; (e) high intensity magnetic separation of the material; (f) grinding of the cementitious fraction resulting from the magnetic separation in the previous step to a size that allows its efficient thermoactivation; and (g) obtaining a thermoactivated recycled cement.