Independent Density and Flow Control for Cement Mixing Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cement mixing systems in well bore servicing applications face instability due to long lag times in response to changes in valve positions, leading to unacceptable oscillations and difficulty in stabilizing the mixture flow rate and density.

Innovation Solution

A control system that independently controls the density and volume flow rate of a cement mixture by using multiple actuators and a controller to manage the flow of dry cement and water, decoupling the effects of changes in commanded outputs, thereby reducing oscillations and improving system stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional dependent control of output parameters is used, then the system structure is simple, but the system stability deteriorates due to long lag times and oscillations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the dependent control into independent control loops. Each output parameter (flow rate, density, temperature, pressure) is controlled independently through separate control algorithms, eliminating the lag and oscillation problems caused by sequential adjustment while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic independent control where control parameters are continuously adjusted in real-time based on feedback from sensors. The controller dynamically calculates optimal actuator positions for each parameter independently, allowing the system to respond rapidly to changes without the stability issues of conventional dependent control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional control methods are used, then the response time is fast, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to oscillations in monitored parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixture parameter precisionVSAvoidcontrol response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary calculations of optimal actuator positions for all output parameters simultaneously based on desired setpoints. This pre-computation allows the system to make coordinated adjustments that achieve precise mixture parameters without the oscillations caused by sequential control, while maintaining fast response through direct implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual output parameters and feeds this information back to the controller. The controller compares actual values with desired setpoints and independently adjusts each actuator to minimize errors, achieving high manufacturing precision without the lag and oscillation problems of conventional feedback control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7494263B2Control system design for a mixing system with multiple inputs
Publication Date: 2009.02.24 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US7494263B2 patent drawing
  • US7494263B2 patent drawing
  • US7494263B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for mixing at least two materials in a physical system having two or more tanks comprises at least two actuators, each actuator being operable to introduce a material into a first tank to form a first mixture, the first mixture flowing into a second tank to form a second mixture and a controller operable, based on a commanded input, to control the at least two actuators to obtain a density of either the first mixture or the second mixture and a volume flow rate of the second mixture out of the second tank, wherein the density is controlled independently from the volume flow rate.