Center-Dense Antenna Array Layout for Grating Lobe Cancellation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing antenna arrays for high-frequency devices face challenges in suppressing grating lobes and side lobes while reducing the number of phase shifters, which complicates phase center calculations and increases system complexity.

Innovation Solution

A two-dimensional antenna array configuration with high density of antenna elements at the center and low density at the corners, where on-elements are electrically connected to phase shifters, reducing the number of phase shifters and effectively suppressing grating and side lobes by breaking the periodicity of the phase center.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If antenna elements are arranged uniformly in a two-dimensional array, then the array structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but grating lobes and side lobes are generated which deteriorate radar performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearray structure simplicityVSAvoidgrating lobe and side lobe generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating non-uniform antenna element distribution where the density of elements varies across different regions of the array. Specifically, elements are arranged with higher density in certain areas and lower density in others, which suppresses grating lobes and side lobes while maintaining manufacturing feasibility. This local variation in element density directly addresses the harmful radiation patterns without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetry by deliberately arranging antenna elements in a non-symmetric, non-uniform pattern across the two-dimensional array. This asymmetric distribution breaks the periodicity that causes grating lobes, while the overall array geometry remains regular and manufacturable. The asymmetric element placement within the uniform grid framework resolves the contradiction between structural simplicity and performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Device complexity

If the number of phase shifters is reduced, then device complexity and cost are lowered, but phase center calculation becomes complicated and beam control precision may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of phase shiftersVSAvoidphase center calculation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the antenna array into multiple sub-arrays, each with its own phase shifter. This segmentation allows for reduced overall complexity while maintaining control precision through localized phase management. The non-uniform element distribution within each sub-array further simplifies phase center calculations by creating predictable radiation patterns that require less complex compensation algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by modifying the spatial distribution parameters of antenna elements (density, positioning) to directly influence phase center characteristics. This parameter optimization allows for simplified phase center calculations while maintaining beam control precision, as the non-uniform distribution creates more predictable and manageable phase relationships across the array.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If antenna elements are densely distributed across the entire array area, then coverage area is maximized, but grating lobes are enhanced and beam steering performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearray coverage areaVSAvoidgrating lobe enhancement
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing variable element density across different regions of the array coverage area. Instead of uniform dense distribution, elements are strategically placed with varying density - higher in regions that contribute to main beam formation and lower in regions that would generate grating lobes. This local optimization maintains effective coverage area while suppressing harmful radiation patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses the area-grating lobe contradiction by introducing density variation as an additional dimension of control within the two-dimensional array plane. This creates a three-dimensional optimization space (x-position, y-position, density) that allows maximization of effective coverage area while minimizing grating lobe generation through strategic element placement density modulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11967774B2Antenna array for high frequency device
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 DENSO CORP
  • US11967774B2 patent drawing
  • US11967774B2 patent drawing
  • US11967774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An antenna array for a high frequency device includes a plurality of antenna elements used for a radar device and arranged in a two-dimensional array in a predetermined area. The plurality of antenna elements includes grouped on-elements and single on-elements with specific distance for grating lobe cancellation, each of them is electrically connected to a phase shifter. The on-elements are arranged such that density of the on-elements at a center portion in the two-dimensional array is high and density of the on-elements at four corners in the two-dimensional array is low.