Vehicular Center Pillar Reinforcing Member Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicular center pillars lack sufficient proof stress against loads input from above the vehicle, particularly in enhancing structural integrity against diagonal loads.

Innovation Solution

A vehicular center pillar design featuring a pillar body with flanges and a reinforcing member that connects these flanges via a predetermined rectilinear connection portion, which includes a seatbelt anchor and protrusions to enhance deformation resistance and proof stress, specifically arranged above the window frame and at locations where the cross-sectional area changes or the pillar's inclination shifts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a conventional reinforcing member design is used in the center pillar, then the basic structural strength is maintained, but the proof stress against loads input from above the vehicle is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproof stress against load from aboveVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing member is segmented into multiple functional portions: a connection portion that rectilinearly connects front and rear flanges, and other portions that may include protrusions or curves. This segmentation allows each portion to perform its specific function optimally while maintaining overall structural integrity and enhancing proof stress against vertical loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing member features a predetermined connection portion with specific rectilinear geometry at critical locations where it connects front and rear flanges. This local quality enhancement at the connection portion provides targeted strength improvement against vertical loads without requiring complex design throughout the entire member, thus resolving the contradiction between strength and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If the center pillar structure is simplified, then production costs are reduced, but the proof stress and structural integrity against diagonal loads are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing member is divided into a connection portion and other portions, where the connection portion has a simple rectilinear shape that is easy to manufacture, while other portions can have more complex geometries if needed for specific functions. This segmentation allows cost-effective production while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection portion is designed with specific geometric parameters (rectilinear shape connecting front and rear flanges) that optimize the proof stress against vertical loads. By carefully selecting these geometric parameters, the structure achieves high reliability without requiring complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If a rectilinear connection portion is added to the reinforcing member, then the proof stress against vertical loads is enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproof stressVSAvoidmember geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Only the connection portion of the reinforcing member is given the specific rectilinear geometry needed to enhance proof stress, while other portions of the member can maintain simpler geometries. This localized application of complex geometry minimizes overall device complexity while achieving the strength enhancement goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing member is segmented such that the connection portion has the rectilinear shape for strength enhancement, while other portions can have different geometries optimized for their specific functions. This segmentation allows the rectilinear connection portion to provide strength benefits without requiring the entire member to be complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8911004B2Vehicular center pillar and vehicle
Publication Date: 2014.12.16 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US8911004B2 patent drawing
  • US8911004B2 patent drawing
  • US8911004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicular center pillar with improved proof stress against loads input from above a vehicle includes a pillar body that extends in a vertical direction of the vehicle and has flanges, formed on the front and rear sides of the pillar body, that extend in a longitudinal direction of the vehicle, and a reinforcing member that connects the front flange to the rear flange. The reinforcing member includes a predetermined connection portion that rectilinearly connects the front flange to the rear flange in the longitudinal direction.