Centering Cone Air Outlet Segmentation for Particle Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing centering cone systems fail to ensure that foreign particles from abrasion do not enter the container while maintaining sufficient air flow for stabilization, which can lead to container damage during processing.

Innovation Solution

The centering cone is designed with an air outlet defined by a passage opening with a screen or multiple individual passage openings, where the flow cross-section narrows, allowing sufficient air to flow and effectively retaining foreign particles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a single large passage opening is used in the centering cone, then sufficient air flow for container stabilization is achieved, but foreign particles from abrasion can enter the container

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair flow volumeVSAvoidforeign particle contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The single large passage opening is divided into multiple smaller individual passage openings. This segmentation allows each small opening to act as a filter for foreign particles while the collective arrangement of multiple openings maintains sufficient total air flow volume for container stabilization during processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the passage opening structure are given different functions: the individual small openings provide filtration quality to block foreign particles, while the overall arrangement and total cross-sectional area provide sufficient air flow quantity for stabilization, thus achieving both requirements through local quality differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple small passage openings are used in the centering cone, then foreign particles are retained effectively, but air flow volume for stabilization may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforeign particle retentionVSAvoidair flow volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The passage opening is segmented into multiple small individual openings that effectively retain foreign particles. The number and arrangement of these segmented openings are optimized so that their combined cross-sectional area provides sufficient total air flow volume for container stabilization, thus resolving the contradiction between particle retention and air flow quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from considering a single dimension (size of individual opening) to multiple dimensions (number of openings, total cross-sectional area, arrangement pattern). By optimizing across these multiple dimensions, the system achieves both effective particle retention through small individual openings and sufficient air flow through the collective arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the centering cone applies pressure to fix the container, then the container is stabilized in position, but the container may be compressed and damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer position stabilityVSAvoidcontainer structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Air is supplied into the container through the passage openings in the centering cone before the container is fully fixed by mechanical pressure. This preliminary pneumatic stabilization increases internal pressure to support the container walls, preventing compression damage when the centering cone subsequently applies mechanical fixing pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Air pressure acts as an intermediary between the centering cone and the container. Instead of direct mechanical pressure causing damage, the air pressure mediates by first providing internal support to the container structure, allowing the mechanical fixing to occur without damaging the container walls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures that foreign particles are retained, preventing contamination while maintaining adequate air flow for container stabilization, even in rotating parts of the system.

Implementation Method 1

the air outlet is defined by a passage opening with a screen, or in that the air outlet is defined by at least two individual passage openings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical filtration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

for supplying clean air into the container through an air outlet of the centering cone so as to increase the internal pressure of the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressurization: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 3

wherein the flow cross-section narrows

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVenturi effect: Venturi Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11945622B2Centering cone for fixing an upright container
Publication Date: 2024.04.02 KRONES AG
  • US11945622B2 patent drawing
  • US11945622B2 patent drawing
  • US11945622B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a centering cone for fixing a container, in particular a container standing on a centering plate, and for supplying clean air into the container through an air outlet of the centering cone so as to increase the internal pressure of the container. The air outlet is defined by a passage opening with a screen or by at least two individual passage openings.