Active Damping in Centerless Grinding Heads for Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centerless grinding machines experience vibrations during operation, leading to instability, poor surface finish, and wear of components, with existing solutions either reducing productivity or being costly and ineffective in fully attenuating vibrations.

Innovation Solution

A dynamically dampened centerless grinding machine with detection means and active dampers configured to detect and counteract vibrations in real time, using a moving mass and actuator to introduce a force opposite the vibration, thereby reducing vibrations effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensors are used to detect vibrations and grinding parameters are modified to correct vibrations, then vibration control is improved, but machine productivity decreases due to reduced speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration controlVSAvoidmachine productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful vibrations into a beneficial control signal by using sensors to detect vibration characteristics and feed this information to a controller that activates dampers. The vibration problem is transformed into a control opportunity, where the vibration signal itself becomes the trigger for the damping action, eliminating the need to reduce grinding speed for vibration control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where sensors continuously monitor vibrations during grinding, the controller processes this information in real-time, and dampers are activated accordingly. This feedback loop enables dynamic vibration control that maintains optimal grinding parameters without sacrificing productivity, as the system adapts to vibration conditions rather than preemptively reducing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If elastomers are used between fixed portions and vibrating portions to absorb vibrations, then vibration damping is improved, but machine cost increases and not all vibrations are attenuated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration dampingVSAvoidmachine cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from static passive damping (elastomers) to dynamic active damping. The dampers are equipped with sensors and controllers that enable them to adapt their damping characteristics in real-time based on actual vibration conditions. This dynamic approach provides more effective and versatile vibration control without requiring extensive mechanical modifications or expensive elastomeric materials throughout the machine structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the damping parameters dynamically by adjusting the activation and force of the dampers based on detected vibration characteristics. Instead of using fixed elastomeric materials with constant damping properties, the invention varies the damping parameters in real-time to match the specific vibration modes and intensities encountered during different grinding operations, providing more comprehensive attenuation across multiple vibration modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If operators manually modify grinding parameters based on experience to prevent vibrations, then no additional equipment is needed, but the method is ineffective and subject to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoidvibration prevention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention enables the machine to self-regulate vibration control through automated sensing and actuation. The sensors continuously monitor vibration levels and the controller automatically adjusts the dampers without requiring operator intervention. This self-service capability eliminates human error and subjectivity while maintaining the relatively simple basic machine structure, providing reliable and consistent vibration control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the manual mechanical adjustment approach (operators physically modifying grinding parameters) with an automated sensor-actuator system. The detection means and dampers constitute a mechatronic system that substitutes human operators in the vibration control function, providing more precise and reliable control while maintaining ease of operation through automation rather than increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively attenuates or eliminates vibrations in real time, improving surface finish and machine productivity while minimizing changes to the machine setup.

Implementation Method 1

The actuator is configured for moving the moving mass... the actuator introduces a force in the moving mass which is a function of the signal detected by the detection means

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectActuator: Linear Motor

Implementation Method 2

at least one damper configured for causing a vibration damping movement... generating the damping movement such that it is opposite the vibration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS11207759B2Dynamically dampened centerless grinding machine tool and grinding method
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 IDEKO SCOOP
  • US11207759B2 patent drawing
  • US11207759B2 patent drawing
  • US11207759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a dynamically dampened centerless grinding machine tool comprising wheels between which there is arranged a part to be ground, heads for carrying the wheels, at least one translation means for translating one of the heads to cause a movement according to a separation and approach direction of the wheels, detection means for detecting a vibration of at least one of the heads, and at least one damper configured for causing a vibration damping movement.