Centralized Authentication System for Cross-Channel Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current customer authentication systems for financial accounts are inconsistent across multiple channels, fail to track and monitor cross-channel transactions, and lack the ability to differentiate between transaction types and account holders, leading to inadequate risk-based authentication and vulnerability to sophisticated fraud techniques.

Innovation Solution

A centralized risk-based authentication system that collects customer data from multiple channels, assesses risk levels, and applies appropriate authentication policies based on transaction risk and customer history, using a central authentication engine, risk assessment engine, and policy rule engine to ensure consistent and secure authentication across all channels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized authentication system is implemented, then authentication consistency across channels is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates multiple distributed authentication applications into a single centralized authentication system that handles all authentication requests across different channels (Internet, phone, bank branches, ATMs). This merging approach ensures consistent authentication policies are applied uniformly across all channels while reducing the overall system complexity by eliminating redundant authentication logic in each channel-specific application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If distributed authentication applications are used, then ease of implementation is improved, but ability to track and monitor cross-channel transactions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidcross-channel transaction tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized authentication system serves multiple functions: it authenticates customers across different channels, tracks cross-channel transactions, monitors risky patterns, and enforces authentication policies. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate tracking systems in each channel while maintaining ease of implementation through a single unified platform that provides comprehensive visibility across all channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If uniform authentication policy is applied across all channels, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to different transaction risks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidrisk-based authentication adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system dynamically adjusts authentication requirements based on the assessed risk level of each transaction. The risk assessment engine evaluates transaction characteristics, customer behavior patterns, and channel-specific factors to determine appropriate authentication measures. This dynamic approach allows the system to apply stricter authentication for high-risk transactions while maintaining ease of operation for low-risk transactions, achieving both adaptability and operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9269085B2Authentication system and method
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US9269085B2 patent drawing
  • US9269085B2 patent drawing
  • US9269085B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the invention relate to a customer authentication system for authenticating a customer making a request related to a customer account. The customer authentication system may include multiple application level data receiving and processing mechanisms for receiving customer requests and collecting customer data. The customer authentication system may additionally include a central authentication system for receiving the customer requests and customer data from the multiple application level data receiving and processing mechanisms, the central authentication system determining, based on authentication policy, whether the collected customer data is sufficient to authenticate each customer in order to fulfill the customer request. The central authentication system may return its conclusions and instructions to the multiple application level data receiving and processing mechanisms. The customer authentication system may additionally include a fraud policy system for centrally managing authentication policy implemented by the central authentication system.