Central Belt System Optical Shadowing Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing central belt systems in order-picking systems face challenges in achieving nearly 100% control of chaotically arranged articles on a moving central belt, particularly in preventing optical shadowing and ensuring accurate data capture of information located on the underside of articles, which is obscured by the central belt.

Innovation Solution

A central belt system with variably adjustable cameras and lighting systems, an automatic control system, and image processing unit, where the camera and lighting configurations prevent optical shadowing by optimizing article spacing and using second cameras to capture underside information after the central belt, along with dynamic speed adjustments and ejector control to ensure clear data capture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If articles are collected in a heap on the moving central belt, then all articles belonging to an order can be gathered, but optical shadowing occurs and prevents accurate image capture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of articles collectedVSAvoidimage capture accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the ejection timing of articles based on real-time position feedback. The control unit calculates optimal ejection moments to ensure articles are spaced at distances that prevent mutual shadowing while maintaining efficient collection, transforming a static heap-collection approach into a dynamic spacing-controlled process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the temporal parameter of article ejection by calculating and enforcing minimum time intervals between successive article ejections. This parameter adjustment ensures that articles arrive on the belt with sufficient spacing to eliminate optical shadowing, directly resolving the contradiction between quantity collection and measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the central belt moves at high speed (approx. 1m/s), then productivity is improved, but the time available for image processing and quality control is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconveying speedVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs image capture and quality control continuously during the articles' passage on the belt, without requiring stopping or slowing down. The camera system and lighting are synchronized with belt motion to capture images at optimal moments, maintaining continuous productivity while enabling thorough inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating optimal ejection timings and positioning articles in advance to ensure they pass through the camera field of view at the correct orientation and spacing, enabling image processing to occur seamlessly during high-speed conveyance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If information is located on the underside of articles, then more data can be captured, but the central belt obscures the underside from camera view

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata capture completenessVSAvoidobstruction by central belt
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a two-dimensional top-down camera view to a three-dimensional approach by positioning cameras at the end of the belt where articles are ejected. This spatial repositioning allows cameras to capture the underside of articles as they leave the belt, eliminating the obstruction problem while maintaining data capture completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If ejectors are activated to space articles apart, then optical shadowing is prevented, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearticle spacing controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a feedback mechanism where the control unit continuously monitors article positions on the belt and dynamically adjusts subsequent ejection timings based on actual spacing measurements. This closed-loop control achieves precise spacing without requiring complex mechanical spacing devices, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2830977B1Central belt system of an order-picking system
Publication Date: 2018.01.31 KNAPP AG
  • EP2830977B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2830977B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2830977B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In the case of a central belt system (1) with article shafts (2), ejectors (5), moving central belt (4) and central control unit (6), it is proposed to provide an automatic control system (7') which is connected to the control unit (6) for articles to be controlled on the moving central belt (4), with a connected image processing unit (8), and a camera system (9, 10) possibly in addition with an illumination system (11). The camera and illumination systems (9, 10) are set in such a way, and the articles to be controlled which are arranged chaotically on the central belt (4) are ejected by the ejectors (5) in such a way, that optical shadow formation at the article to be controlled on the central belt (4) is preferably just prevented.